Connect with us

Opinion

What Good Can Akpabio’s 10th Senate Offer Nigeria?

Published

on

By Mon-Charles Egbo

Before the inauguration of the 10th national assembly and the subsequent emergence of Godswill Akpabio as the president of the senate, a cross-section of the political class was fiercely opposed to his aspiration. Their grouse was how his party, the All Progressives Congress, APC, endorsed him.

Some welcomed the zoning of the position to the South-South region but faulted the extra step of micro-zoning it to an individual.

Another set was solely upset that the then president-elect, Bola Tinubu, influenced the choice of Akpabio. To them, that would amount to an outright hijack of the legislature by the presidency which is antithetical to the principle of separation of powers. Then while others canvassed that the contest should be thrown open for everyone interested, the rest specifically clamoured for their various zones as against Akpabio’s South-South. But common to all those categories was the claim of insufficient consultation before settling on Akpabio.

And quite indeed, the agitations caught fire across the country, especially through some sorts of elitist orchestrations. The heat did not only threaten the unity and stability of the party, but it also posed an early distraction for Tinubu’s presidency, as he variously intervened.

Advertisement

But objectively speaking, all those shades of opinion were not misplaced. They were all valid arguments for whatever democracy entails. Even Senator Akpabio who was in the eye of the storm recognized the rights of those aggrieved compatriots. He empathized with them. Openly, he acknowledged the grave implications of the “angst that this zoning arrangement may have caused some aspirants”. Thus he stressed that “for this reason, we are embarking on an extensive reconciliatory move, as well as an enlightenment campaign to brief relevant stakeholders on details of our prospective legislative agenda. We are confident that in the end, we will reconcile all in the overriding interests of our dear nation. We will ensure that the members of the 10th Assembly put aside their differences and focus on activities that are for the common good of the Nigerian people”.

And so vigorously, he reached out to those dissenting voices reminding them that a divided house is a defeated house.

It was this display of political sagacity and a good understanding of the place of reconciliation in democratic governance that set the tone for the eventual outcome and has now offered the prism through which the contest is holistically reviewed, for the records. In other words, Akpabio’s emergence was not just about the party’s endorsement. Certainly, it was not!

To begin with, and ironically, all those diverse agitations were largely not about the public interest, otherwise, why were there no questions, not even one, raised about Akpabio’s eligibility and competence? Nobody countered his agenda with superior ones. None faulted his conduct during the contest. The obsessions merely were with the party’s mode of choosing him and not with national developmental issues.

So, to the discerning mind, what does this startling paradox signify?

Advertisement

It represents an affirmation that Godswill Akpabio is eminently qualified to hold the office of the president of the senate or that as a mortal he may have his shortcomings as no one is perfect, but his pedigree is not in doubt. Among others, Akpabio is a lawyer of repute and a ranking senator. He parades robust political leadership credentials and has no record whatsoever of having been declared unfit to hold public office. Also, he has paid his dues both in the private and public sectors, he is a good party man and comes from a geo-political zone that was yet to produce a president of the senate since 1979.

Then again, Senator Akpabio is a man of exceptional eloquence and charisma who is always ready to tell his own stories with confidence. As such and in his words, modestly: “….I possess the required ranking status and deep legislative experience. These qualities are of competence, vision, patriotism, a deep love for our country, and a thorough understanding of the relationship between the executive and legislature. I believe that my uncommon public sector experience and track records spanning over 24 years where I served at the State Executive Council as Hon. Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy affairs, Governor of a State, Senate Minority Leader, and in the Federal Executive Council as a Hon. Minister, provides me with the unique experience required to drive the legislative agenda of the 10th National Assembly”.

Deliberately, he down-played a part. He was certified worthy and fit to fly the presidential flag of his party before he patriotically withdrew from the race at the venue of the primaries.

Empirically, therefore, it was not an error for anyone to have embraced and supported Akpabio in the first place. His amiable and dynamic personality, democratic leadership attributes, evidence-based performance records and proven political astuteness were highly irresistible. Put together, they signposted his suitability for the office. And expectedly, no one expressed contrary views to this abridged citation, amidst the criticisms, thus alluding that indeed, Akpabio’s emergence was not all about his party’s endorsement.

Interestingly again, Akpabio’s concise blueprint was quite strategic. It attested to his overall sense of preparedness for the tasks ahead, a profound grasp of the demands of the office as well as a clear understanding that legislature is about good governance and good governance alone.

Advertisement

He had envisioned a 10th senate that would “provide quality, stable and inclusive leadership at the National Assembly with a view to providing robust legislative intervention and making relevant laws for good governance” and also “galvanise a united and virile support base that will provide credible government policies for the advancement of good governance”.

And in response to the dire socio-economic situation in the country, Akpabio’s legislative agenda focussed majorly on revamping the domestic economy. According to him, “we shall ensure that pro-business legislations to create a more conducive environment for businesses to thrive must be designed and implemented; and we must provide legislation that enables support for small and medium-sized enterprises, and helps to reduce the barriers to entry for small businesses. These categories of legislation as well as others that promote the growth of the economy, and help create a more prosperous and vibrant nation must be our priority”.

Similarly, his 10th Senate would seek to “develop and promote innovative bills that will enhance revenue generation while exercising effective oversight function on government expenditure”.

Evidently, please, has Senator Akpabio not subtly warned that anything that is not good governance-oriented would have no place in the business of this senate?

Furthermore, Akpabio’s vast experience in public leadership substantially shaped his agenda. His commitment to upholding some legislative gains and progressive features of the preceding assemblies underscores his conviction that governance is about the people and that government is a continuum. For instance, he resolved to “sustain the January to December budget circle” which he noted that “the ninth Assembly had worked so hard to achieve”. Also, while the 9th Senate was christened the “senate that works for Nigerians”, Akpabio is ambitious to lead a 10th senate that “serves as a true voice of the people”. Again, while the 8th and 9th senates made efforts at entrenching transparency in the affairs of the institution, resulting in the eventual disclosure of the national assembly budget details, Akpabio hinted that his leadership would be “also deeply committed to promoting transparency and accountability: values that we believe must be at the heart of everything that is done in the Senate”. Then to advance the bipartisan feature of the 9th Senate, he would “establish Bipartisan Parliamentary Network on issues of national interest supported by our party’s/members’ vision”.

Advertisement

Now again, are these not pointers that it takes a transformational leader to celebrate and propagate the transformational deeds of another leader? This is yet another area that Godswill Akpabio distinguished himself.

Notably also, Akpabio’s passion for a peaceful and stable polity coupled with knowledge of the governance deficits created by the 1999 constitution, perhaps explains his determination to also consolidate the collaboration between the legislature and the other arms of government, for national development. For emphasis, the Nigerian president is the most powerful in the world by the 1999 constitution. You can only challenge his powers and influence in principle but not in practice!

Nevertheless, Akpabio was overtly precise in purposing a national assembly that would work harmoniously with Bola Tinubu’s presidency, without compromising the relative independence of the parliament. Hear him: “We want him (Tinubu) to replicate what has happened in Lagos in the last 24 years of democracy to cover the rest of the country. Particularly, we are challenged by the economy. We want to see serious improvement in the IGR of the nation to enable us to repay our loan facilities. We want to see more foreign direct investment in the country. We will support him through favourable legislations to ensure Nigeria remains investment-friendly and a business destination in Africa”.

Akpabio campaigned with this mindset. He was explicit and did not pretend about it. Please, how else does one describe courage? Meanwhile, his agenda equally emphasized, “innovative bills that will enhance revenue generation while exercising effective oversight function on government expenditure”. And again, asserting the relative authorities of the legislature, he declared that “regular and extensive oversight of government spending to ensure that public funds are being used effectively and efficiently must be conducted”.

Then quite instructively, Akpabio worked his way to victory. As highlighted earlier, he did not go to sleep having secured the corporate endorsement of his party and other stakeholders across party lines. He did not allow the ‘anointing’ to get into his head. He took no one for granted and left nothing to chance. He relentlessly went about the contest as though all those mounted oppositions to his preference by the party would eventually play out. He ran a robust campaign built on a broad-based support network. He aggressively marketed himself and his agenda. Resiliently and consistently, he demonstrated that every single senator-elect was as important as the other, irrespective of the political party. He variously visited the leaderships of other parties for support. And once again, his shrewdness in reaching out to the aggrieved colleagues was a masterstroke.

Advertisement

Equally pivotal was Akpabio’s pragmatism in seeking to foster a sense of camaraderie among his colleagues which would create a consciousness for national unity and inclusiveness in governance and also opportunities for peer review towards integrated national development. This found expression in his other action plans, some of which are to: “support members in bill and motion drafting, presentation of legislative arguments, legislative briefs and a general understanding of parliamentary practices and procedures; support our members to develop legislative agenda, constituency work-plan and integrated representation model; institute Annual Parliamentary Stability Group Summit (APSGS) to strategize, review and develop action guidelines for greater virile and stable national assembly; and pursue and lobby (where necessary) for the rights and privileges of our members.”

Again, a question: who would not garner massive votes with these appealing propositions?

So by inference, the fore-going factors cumulatively translated to the ballots whose figures indicated that partisan, religious and regional barriers were demolished. Remarkably also, nobody was prevented from contesting. Yes, the senators-elect conventionally, freely and popularly conferred legitimacy on Akpabio, thus confirming that their choice was predicated on his nationalistic disposition, wide acceptability and compelling agenda. It was not necessarily about the party’s endorsement. Put differently, the process was unquestionably transparent.

Therefore given Akpabio’s outstanding personality and his inspiring blueprint, this senate nay the 10th national assembly, will impact meaningfully the lives of the people, and then of course, Nigeria is the ultimate beneficiary. But this happens only when everyone through their elected representatives gets involved by offering timely and useful information in addition to asking relevant questions. For it is only by trust and cooperation that we can take full ownership of this senate and uncommonly transform it as our “true voice”.

Egbo is a reputation management expert

Advertisement
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Uzodinma’s Strategic Masterstroke And The Return Of The Political Maverick

Published

on

*By Kamen Chuks Ogbonna*.

The political landscape of Nigeria, particularly in the Southeast, has been set abuzz following the announcement by the Governor of Imo State and National Coordinator of the Renewed Hope Ambassadors (RHA), His Excellency Hope Uzodinma.

The appointment of 16 high-caliber directors to lead the RHA’s nationwide directorates is not merely an administrative exercise; it is a clear signal that the countdown to 2027 has begun with a surgical focus on grassroots mobilization.

While the list features several heavyweights—including Tunde Rahman (Media), Sunday Dare (Digital Media), and Muiz Banire, SAN (Legal)—one name has sent a specific jolt through the opposition: Chief Olisa Metuh.

For those who observed the peak years of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the name Chief Olisa Metuh is synonymous with high-stakes political engineering.

Advertisement

Metuh, often described as a “political warhorse,” rose through the ranks from ex-officio, auditor to the formidable National Publicity Secretary of the party whose big shoes never got filled after his exit.

He was the “Maverick” who preferred the shadows but whose tactical fingerprints were visible on every major victory the PDP recorded during its era of dominance.

History recalls that when the PDP faced its darkest hours post-2015, it was Metuh who acted as the anchor, preventing the party from sinking.

He was the mastermind behind the emergence of Bukola Saraki as Senate President alongside PDP’s Ike Ekweremadu as deputy and the elevation of Hon. Yakubu Dogara as Speaker—moves that effectively ran rings around the then-ruling APC under President Buhari.

His track record in the Southeast is equally legendary. From orchestrating Peter Obi’s move into the PDP to the yeoman efforts that secured governorships for PDP’s Okezie Ikpeazu in Abia and David Umahi in Ebonyi, Metuh’s ability to deliver electoral mandates is undisputed.

Advertisement

Critics might wonder what brings a man out of a self-imposed retirement—announced just two years ago—into the fold of the RHA.

However, for a man who recently dedicated over half a billion naira to charity, it is evident that pecuniary interests are not the driver.Instead, it appears that the “political legend” has answered a call of strategic importance.

By accepting the role of Director of Organisation and Mobilisation, Metuh is being positioned exactly where his talents shine brightest: at the intersection of strategy and execution.

President Bola Tinubu, through Governor Uzodinma, has played a deft hand. The Southeast has long been a complex battleground for the ruling party. By bringing in a man who understands the regional political DNA better than most, the Renewed Hope administration is moving beyond rhetoric.

Metuh knows the backroom because he built it. His appointment is a massive blow to the opposition in the Southeast because it replaces theoretical campaigning with proven, battle-tested electoral dexterity.

Advertisement

The Renewed Hope Ambassadors (RHA) was designed by President Tinubu in November 2025 as the primary vehicle to disseminate the achievements of his administration.

With the appointment of this dream team of directors, the RHA has moved from a conceptual framework to a fully operational political machine.

In the chess game of Nigerian politics, Governor Uzodinma has just moved a queen.

As the January elections approach, the inclusion of Chief Olisa Metuh ensures that the Renewed Hope Agenda will not just be heard in the Southeast—it will be felt.

In the street parlance- E Go Loud !

Advertisement

For Ndi Igbo and the nation at large, this appointment is a testament to the fact that in politics, strategy is the only currency that never devalues.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Mama Anambra Breaks New Ground: From Health To Skills Empowerment

Published

on

– Kamen Chuks Ogbonna

In the landscape of sub-national governance in Nigeria, the office of the First Lady has often been seen through the lens of ceremonial duties. However, in Anambra State, Dr. (Mrs.) Nonye Soludo—affectionately known as Mama Anambra—is fundamentally redefining this role. Through a series of bold, unprecedented interventions, she has evolved from a pillar of support to a strategic driver of socio-economic transformation.

The impact of Mama Anambra’s leadership first gained significant momentum in the healthcare sector. Championing the cause of the vulnerable, she has been at the forefront of the free maternal and child healthcare initiative. This program has provided thousands of women and children across the state with access to life-saving services that were previously out of reach. Beyond clinical care, her “Healthy Living” crusade has introduced a paradigm shift in domestic wellness, promoting organic products and nutritional education as a primary defence against preventable diseases.

The Anambra First Lady’s vision quickly extended to the fields and farms of the state. Recognizing that food security is the bedrock of community stability, she successfully mobilized women at the grassroots level into productive farming. By providing tools, seedlings, and technical support, she has empowered the home-front to become a formidable force in Anambra’s agricultural value chain, ensuring that empowerment is not just a slogan but a harvest.

Mama Anambra has raised the bar once again by moving into the territory of high-impact vocational empowerment. Her current focus on skills acquisition for females in male-dominated fields is perhaps her most strategic move yet. By opening doors for women in technology, construction, welding, solar energy installation, and mechanics, she is actively dismantling age-old barriers. These sectors, long regarded as “no-go areas” for women, are now being flooded with talented female trainees ready to compete in the modern economy. This initiative does more than provide a job; it destroys the gender limitations that have historically stifled the potential and prosperity of the girl child.

Advertisement

For Ndi Anambra, the work of the First Lady is a clear signal that leadership fueled by empathy and vision delivers tangible results. Her interventions are not merely philanthropic gestures, as they are strategic investments in the human capital of the state. Through her tireless efforts, Dr. Mrs Nonye Soludo is proving that when leadership has a heart, change is not just felt—it is seen and touched.

As she continues to break new ground, the prayer of the people remains constant: May God continue to strengthen her for the journey ahead.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Our Son, Uche Geoffrey Nnaji, Your Shame Dey Shame Us

Published

on

By Emeka Nwobodo Jr

There is a saying in Akpugo that elders often repeat whenever a son brings public disgrace upon his people and yet appears completely oblivious of it. They say the mad man dancing naked at Oriemba market never feels ashamed of himself, but his kinsmen do. The mad man laughs loudly, beats his chest, and continues his strange dance as though nothing is wrong, utterly unaware of the embarrassment he has caused, while his people are left to pass through the same market with their eyes lowered, quietly enduring the humiliation that someone from their own kindred has turned himself into a public spectacle before the entire community.

That local saying has suddenly become painfully real for many sons and daughters of Akpugo today, because what we are experiencing at this moment mirrors exactly the kind of shame those elders spoke about.

Our son, Chief Uche Geoffrey Nnaji, the former Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology, has dragged the good name of Akpugo through the mud in a manner so appalling that it has now become a constant conversation, and the painful truth is that the disgrace echoes loudly across the country.

When the first murmurs of the certificate controversy surrounding Uche Nnaji began to circulate months ago, many of us in Akpugo initially dismissed the allegations as the usual mischief of Nigerian politics, where accusations are often peddled, sometimes driven by rivalry, jealousy, or the relentless struggle for power. After all, Nigerian political life is crowded with smear campaigns, and it is not unusual for public figures to be accused of things that later turn out to be exaggerated, distorted, or entirely fabricated.

Advertisement

But this particular story refused to fade away. Instead, it lingered stubbornly, gathering more evidence, and attracting more scrutiny in a way that made it increasingly difficult for any discerning observer to dismiss as mere political gossip.

For nearly two years, investigative journalists at Premium Times searched for documents, spoke with university officials, filed Freedom of Information requests, and examined records that had long been buried. As these revelations began to surface, the scandal exploded with extraordinary force. The shit literally hit the ceiling fan!

The entire country was stunned that the man entrusted with overseeing scientific research and technological innovation in Nigeria could find himself entangled in a scandal involving forged academic credentials, an irony that might have been amusing if it were not so embarrassing.

Even those who were prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt were thrown into confusion when, in a self-indicting overreach, he rushed to the Federal High Court in Abuja and filed a suit against UNN, with a sworn affidavit supporting his motion wherein he admitted that he had not been issued a degree certificate by UNN, even though a certificate bearing the university’s name had earlier been submitted by him to the Nigerian Senate during his ministerial screening. How then did he come into possession of the one he submitted to the Senate, many people asked?

To the credit of the federal authorities, rather than rushing to conclusions or reacting impulsively to the media storm, the presidency reportedly moved discreetly, dispatching a team of DSS officers directly from the Abuja headquarters to the UNN, where they conducted their own verification of academic records and examined the files connected with Uche Nnaji’s student history. The operatives reportedly examined the registry archives, scrutinized correspondences, and verified documentary evidence relating to his academic history. Their findings reportedly corroborated the mounting evidence that had already begun to surface in the public domain.

Advertisement

Once the facts had been assembled and verified, the information was reportedly relayed to the highest levels of government. When Uche Nnaji was subsequently summoned to Aso Rock, the outcome was his quiet exit from the seat of power as an ex-Minister. His purported resignation was widely interpreted as a move to save the image of the government before the scandal could inflict grave reputational damage on the administration both within Nigeria and in the eyes of the international community.

But the matter did not end there. The federal government set up an investigative panel under the Federal Ministry of Education to determine the truth once and for all. The panel did not rely on hearsay or political narratives. Members of the panel physically travelled to the UNN, where they examined the institution’s archives, reviewed Senate graduation lists, inspected registry movement logs and academic files, and interviewed university officials who were directly involved in keeping academic records.

When the panel eventually submitted its report, the conclusion was devastating. It found that our brother had indeed forged his UNN degree certificate, confirming earlier investigative findings which had already raised serious questions about the authenticity of the documents he submitted when he was nominated and confirmed as minister.

The records examined by the panel showed that although he had been admitted to study Biological Sciences at the UNN in the 1981/82 academic session, he never graduated from the university because he failed a core course, Virology (MCB 431). His name did not appear on the Senate-approved graduation list for the class of 1985, and correspondences found in his academic file showed that he was still communicating with the university in 1986, requesting for permission to retake the same failed course.

Yet somehow, despite these records, a certificate dated July 1985 surfaced, the very certificate he presented to the presidency and the National Assembly as proof that he had graduated from one of Nigeria’s most prestigious universities.

Advertisement

When the details of this investigation became public two weeks ago, the scandal again spread across the country like wildfire.

But for many of us in Akpugo, the shock went beyond the scandal itself. What worsened the embarrassment was the astonishing mediocrity of the inconsistencies surrounding the documents. If someone were attempting to deceive the entire country in such a serious matter, one would at least expect that the deception would be executed with careful attention to detail. Instead, what Nigerians saw were contradictions so glaring that even a primary school pupil could detect them without difficulty.

Imagine claiming to have graduated from university in July 1985 while records show that you wrote a letter in your own handwriting in 1986 applying to resit the exam for the same course that had prevented you from graduating. Imagine presenting an NYSC discharge certificate claiming that you began national service in April 1985, three months before the supposed graduation that made you eligible for service in the first place. The absurdity of such a claim leaves one wondering whether the basic chronology of university education and national service was ever considered in constructing that narrative.

But it got even worse. The NYSC certificate that was presented bore the signature of Colonel Animashaun Braimoh, who only served as Director-General of the National Youth Service Corps between 1988 and 1990, yet the certificate was supposedly issued in 1986.

Even the serial numbering exposed the forgery. NYSC certificates issued during that period were known to carry six-digit numbers without alphabetic characters, yet the certificate attributed to him carried the serial number A231309, complete with a letter prefix that did not exist in the numbering format of that period.

Advertisement

At that point, many of us in Akpugo began to ask a painful question. Who actually handled the contract for this forgery, and why was it done so carelessly?

For those of us who have known Uche Nnaji over the years, especially as Minister of the Federal Republic, always immaculately dressed in sparkling white attire, projecting confidence, speaking with bravado, and presenting himself as a man of class and sophistication, the revelations were shocking because they suggested a man operating at a surprisingly low, inept and dull-witted level.

It was not merely the allegation of forgery that hurt us the most, it was the clumsiness, the mediocrity, and the lack of intellectual rigour reflected in the inconsistencies that riddled it.

For a community like Akpugo that prides itself as one of the most human-resource rich communities in Nkanuland, perhaps even in Enugu State, the humiliation has been profound.

When the revelations exploded across the country, something unusual happened within our community. Akpugo WhatsApp groups fell silent. The chatter that usually fills our platforms disappeared almost immediately. Nobody seemed able to muster a convincing defence. Nobody could confidently explain what was happening. The silence itself spoke volumes.

Advertisement

Many of us expected that our son would at least address his people directly, perhaps by releasing a brief statement assuring us that the allegations were false and that he would clear his name.

Instead, a group of young men whom he had helped secure federal appointments suddenly emerged as his defenders, flooding social media with accusations against political enemies and elaborate theories about conspiracies orchestrated by opponents.

They blamed political enemies, they blamed Governor Mbah and anyone who could possibly be blamed, while leaving the the central question unanswered. But even if we assume that political rivalry played a role in exposing the matter, the question that still demands an answer is: Did Uche Nnaji forge the certificates or not?

The federal government’s investigative panel has already delivered its conclusion with findings that leave very little room for ambiguity, and the next logical outcome is arraignment and prosecution before a court of competent jurisdiction. Why that has not happened is a matter for lawyers to enlighten us on.

Yet what has been happening since then has been even more bewildering. Even by Nigerian standards, when a public figure is caught in a scandal of such magnitude, humility usually follows. The person withdraws from the spotlight, keeps a low profile, and allows time and reflection to restore whatever dignity remains. But what we are witnessing instead is a relentless attempt to project normalcy. An aggressive social-media campaign filled with praise songs, banners, and political slogans announcing grand ambitions for the future suddenly appeared everywhere, with posters declaring “Uche Ndi Enugu Ga Eme” and “Uche Nnaji for Governor 2027” circulating as though nothing had happened.

Advertisement

It leaves many observers wondering which political party would willingly entrust its governorship ticket to someone whose academic credentials have been publicly discredited in such a dramatic fashion. Even more troubling is that since the scandal erupted, Uche Nnaji himself has carefully avoided direct engagement with the press to answer questions on the certificate saga. At one point he invited journalists to a press conference but failed to appear, leaving proxies behind to answer questions they could not adequately address. Yet if there is anyone who can narrate the story of his academic records better than anyone else, it is Uche Nnaji himself.

This is why the situation pains many of us in Akpugo to the marrows of our bones. Our community has never been associated with this level of public scandal. Our elders often boast that Akpugo have it all. Our land has produced true legends and giants whose contributions have brought honour to our people. From distinguished military officers like Navy Commodore James Aneke, who once served as a military governor, and Colonel Anthony Obi, another respected former military governor, to national figures like Ogbonnaya Onovo, the first Igbo Inspector-General of Police, Akpugo has produced individuals whose careers were defined by excellence and integrity. The intellectual and spiritual leadership of Very Rev. Father Emmanuel Edeh, founder of Madonna University, Caritas University, and the Osisatech institutions, has shaped generations of students and professionals. Scholars such as Prof. Onyemaechi Ogbunwezeh, Prof. B. A. Okorie, Prof. Gozie Ogbodo (current Rector of the IMT Enugu), to mention but a few, have continued that tradition of academic excellence.

These men and women represent the values of hard work, honesty, discipline, and integrity that Akpugo holds dear. That is why this scandal hurts so much.

Our elders must call our son home, sit him down, and remind him that wherever he goes he carries the name of Akpugo with him, and that name must not be dragged through the mud of public scandal.

So with heavy hearts, we say to our son Uche Nnaji, Enough is Enough. Although we still love you as our own flesh and blood, although we can longer disown you, you must however be a man, face the truth and clear your name if you can. But please, do not continue to parade this disgrace before the world.

Advertisement

Because whether you feel the shame or not, your shame dey shame us!

  1. – Nwobodo writes from Akpugo, Nkanu West LGA.
Continue Reading

Opinion

Honour Is Not Scholarship: Nigeria Must Protect the Integrity of the Title “Dr.”

Published

on

By Lanre Ogundipe

“The institutional goal of science is the extension of certified knowledge.”
— Robert K. Merton
Certification is not ceremonial. It is procedural. It is earned through disciplined inquiry, supervised research, peer review, and intellectual defence. It is recorded, verified, and preserved within the institutional memory of academia. When certification becomes ambiguous, authority itself becomes fragile.
Nigeria today faces a quiet but consequential erosion in the meaning of one of its most recognisable academic distinctions—the title “Dr.” What was historically reserved for individuals who completed rigorous postgraduate research and successfully defended original scholarship is increasingly treated as a decorative prefix in public life.
An earned doctorate represents methodological discipline, intellectual labour, and verified scholarly contribution. An honorary doctorate represents institutional recognition of achievement or service. Both possess value. But they are not equivalent. They were never intended to be.
Yet across Nigeria’s public sphere the distinction is often blurred. Recipients of honorary doctorates frequently adopt the unqualified prefix “Dr.” in political campaigns, corporate communication, religious platforms, and public identity branding. Over time repetition normalises equivalence. Equivalence dilutes meaning. And dilution erodes standards.
This development is no longer merely a matter of etiquette. It has become a question of institutional governance.
The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria vests authority in the state to regulate educational standards. Section 4 grants legislative powers to the National Assembly, while Item 60 of the Exclusive Legislative List empowers the Federation to coordinate university education and regulate institutions responsible for academic standards. Sections 16 and 18 further mandate the State to promote efficient and dynamic education.
Pursuant to this constitutional authority, the National Universities Commission (NUC) was established under the National Universities Commission Act (Cap N81, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004). Section 4 of that Act empowers the Commission to lay down minimum academic standards and accredit academic awards.
If the state can regulate degrees, it must also protect the integrity of the titles that represent those degrees.
Yet a troubling regulatory gap persists. While the NUC accredits programmes and supervises universities, its authority to regulate the public representation of honorary doctoral titles remains largely advisory. It may discourage misuse, but it lacks explicit statutory enforcement powers to prevent confusion between honorary recognition and earned scholarship.
This silence has created a dangerous grey zone.
Under current criminal law, misuse of academic titles becomes actionable mainly when it intersects with fraud—such as impersonation or obtaining benefits under false pretence. Outside those circumstances, ambiguity persists even when the representation misleads the public.
Ambiguity, even when not criminal, has systemic consequences.
Academic titles function as signals within a knowledge economy. Employers rely on them. International collaborators rely on them. Funding agencies rely on them. When those signals become elastic, credibility contracts.
Nigeria aspires to global competitiveness in research, innovation, and higher education. Universities seek international partnerships, research grants, and improved global rankings. These ambitions require the reliability of academic certification. A doctoral title must convey the same meaning in Abuja as it does in Oxford, Berlin, or Toronto: verified scholarly attainment.
Recent developments within Nigeria’s legal profession illustrate that this concern is no longer theoretical. The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) recently cautioned Senior Advocates against using the prefix “Dr.” in court where the title derives solely from an honorary doctorate. The warning reflects a growing awareness among professional institutions that honorary recognition must not be mistaken for certified academic achievement.
When even the legal profession begins to safeguard the distinction between honour and scholarship, the message is clear: precision in professional titles matters.
Nigeria’s own regulatory culture already recognises this principle in other fields. The Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria, for example, strictly regulates who may present themselves as a medical doctor. Misrepresentation in clinical settings attracts sanction because professional trust depends on verified training and licensure.
No one interprets such regulation as hostility to honour. It is simply protection of public trust.
Academic titles deserve similar clarity.
The proliferation of honorary doctorate awards—sometimes conferred by institutions whose accreditation histories are unclear or contested—has intensified the urgency of reform. Universities have every right to celebrate distinguished citizens who contribute meaningfully to society. Recognition of excellence beyond academia enriches national culture.
But recognition must not become credential simulation.
There is also a democratic dimension to this issue. Citizens rely on public titles to assess authority and expertise. When honorary awards are presented indistinguishably from earned academic credentials, the public may infer scholarly competence where none was formally conferred. Such ambiguity undermines transparency.
Transparency is the foundation of democratic trust.
Nigeria therefore needs deliberate regulatory clarity. The National Assembly should consider legislative amendments that explicitly distinguish honorary doctoral awards from earned doctoral degrees within statutory language governing higher education.
Such reforms could empower the National Universities Commission to issue binding regulations on the formal use of academic titles, require honorary degree recipients to indicate “Honoris Causa” in official representations, and introduce proportionate civil sanctions for deliberate academic misrepresentation.
These measures would not diminish honour. They would protect scholarship.
Nigeria’s intellectual infrastructure depends on reliable academic signals. When the meaning of “Dr.” becomes negotiable, the value of earned scholarship depreciates. When scholarship depreciates, the credibility of universities declines. And when universities lose credibility, national development itself suffers.
Academic integrity is not symbolic. It is structural.
The State’s constitutional duty to promote efficient and dynamic education cannot coexist with permissive ambiguity surrounding the nation’s highest academic distinction. Protecting the meaning of “Dr.” is not about prestige. It is about preserving the integrity of certification—the very mechanism through which knowledge becomes credible.
Nigeria possesses the constitutional authority. The legal framework already exists. What remains is regulatory courage.
Honour is important.
Scholarship is indispensable.
They must never be confused.

Ogundipe, Public Affairs Analyst, former President Nigeria Union of Journalists and the Federation of African Journalists, writes from Abuja.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Sen. Ezea’s Replacement: Young Persons Suspected to Be Favoured Mapped for Media Attacks, Blackmails

Published

on

By Asogwa Damian
(Damasogwa212@gmail.com)

As the wait for INEC to release the schedule for the conduct of the by-election to replace the senator who represented Enugu North Senatorial District continues, a group of greedy and power-drunk politicians from the zone have started their selfish games against some persons perceived as young and vibrant blood from the area. They believe that Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah may go for a younger person full of energy and vision who can represent the district well, consolidate on his good works, and introduce a new approach compared to what was previously obtainable.

These greedy politicians, many of whom secretly worked against the Governor during the 2023 election and failed woefully in their polling units, even as they were given contracts and appointments, have set up a media team that will attack young people from the zone, especially those from Nsukka/Igboeze South federal constituency.

As part of their plan, their first target became the council chairman of Igboeze South, whom they see as a prolific disciple of the Governor’s administration, who relates with the people irrespective of class across the senatorial zone. The aim is to make him appear overambitious in the eyes of the Governor and other decision-makers so as to remove him from any consideration table or idea. Another strategy is to sponsor write-ups in both traditional and social media portraying him as supporting those who criticise the Governor in order to damage his image.

It was reported that these men, including a former Gubernatorial aspirant, former commissioners, former DGs of parastatals, retiring public servants, a former state party chairman, a former candidate for the position, and a few businessmen, are working together and holding meetings both offline and online to this effect.

Advertisement

Some of them held their first meeting a few days after the burial of late Senator Okey Ezea, where names of young people from the zone who might likely be favoured by the Governor were listed for attacks and blackmail. The cabals perceive them as the likely favoured candidates by the powers that be and thus want to malign their integrity so as to put them off the race.

These cabals also have their individual plots of alternative means to maneuver themselves into the position and have held meetings with a former minister from Nkanu West Local Government Area, who is currently seen as a political enemy of the Governor. The plan is to work against the Governor if he does not protect their interest.

It was also reported that other names being mentioned for this negative media framing include the member representing Nsukka/Igboeze South federal constituency, Hon Chidi Obetta; the current chairman of Nsukka Local Government Area, Hon Jude Asogwa; current Commissioner for Special Duties, Hon Sunday Ajogwu; former chairman of Igboeze South Local Government, Hon Peter Andy Omeje; former chairman of Nsukka Local Government, Hon Tony Ugwu; Board Member of Federal Polytechnic Oko, Amb Favour Asogwa; Special Adviser to the Governor on Experiential Learning, Dr. Mrs Chinyere Onyisi; former member, Enugu State House of Assembly, Rt Hon Erochukwu Ugwueze, amongst others.

According to some sources, the attacks and blackmails on the council chairman of Igboeze South Local Government Area didn’t work as planned, and some of the cabal members see him as being innocuous of any intention to run. The next target is Hon Chidi Obetta, who they see as their worst enemy owing to his closeness to the Governor and some powers that be at the National Assembly and APC national secretariat.

Sources within the political circle in the zone also revealed that the group has begun reaching out to some bloggers and media handlers known for aggressive online campaigns. Their assignment is to gradually introduce damaging narratives against the identified individuals while presenting their preferred aspirant in a favourable light. The strategy is to flood the media space with negative reports so that such impressions may influence public opinion and create doubts about the competence and loyalty of the young leaders, which they have started with the current chairman of Igboeze South Local Government Area.

Advertisement

Some observers believe that the unfolding development may deepen political divisions within the zone if urgent steps are not taken to manage the situation. Many party faithful are already expressing concern that the activities of the group may weaken unity in the zone and distort their collective effort to support the administration of Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah.

There are also fears that the continuous spread of unverified allegations and sponsored attacks may create unnecessary tension among political stakeholders in the zone. Political watchers therefore urge restraint and advise that the process of selecting a suitable replacement should be guided by fairness, competence, and the overall interest of the people of Enugu North Senatorial District.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending