Connect with us

Politics

Nothing bad in taking care of Enugu ex-governors, deputies — Assembly Leader

Published

on

 

Ikechukwu Ezeugwu is the member representing Udenu Constituency and the Leader of the Enugu State House of Assembly. He is the sponsor of the controversial Ex-Governors, Deputies Pension Bill. He tells RAPHAEL EDE that the lack of trust between the government and the people is responsible for the public outcry against the bill

Can you tell us more about the controversial life pension bill for ex-governors and their deputies which has generated uproar in the state?

The law in question is not the creation of the 7th Assembly of the Enugu State House of Assembly. The Enugu State Gubernatorial Pensions Law 2007’ partly states that ‘a law to provide for the grant of pension to the governor and deputy governor on leaving office and other matters connected therewith, enacted by Enugu State House of Assembly, this day 2nd of August 2007.’ Owing to the fact that the law is dynamic, it was amended in 2017.

Since I became the leader, I have sponsored all executive bills and if one is brought now for me to sponsor tomorrow, I will do it. I interface between the executive and the legislature. I am carrying out my functions, and again, the House of Assembly has its role to play as Section 124(5) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) gives power to the state Houses of Assembly to make provisions for a law for grant of pensions and gratuities to former governors and former deputy governors. We are not acting outside the constitution. The framers of the constitution knew why they put it in the constitution. It isn’t our creation, and the bill in question was just mentioned on Thursday, March 11, 2021, which was the first reading. The person representing you in your state House Assembly can present a bill on your behalf.

We have three stages before a bill becomes a law – the first stage is the first reading, which is the presentation which we just did. After the first reading, a date will be selected for the second reading and during the second reading, the sponsor of the bill will be talking about the advantages of the bill. He will canvass his reasons for bringing the bill and urge his colleagues to support it. It is during the second reading that members will have an opportunity to speak, having been given copies of the bill on the day of the first reading. If at the end of the day the majority says that they are not in support of the bill, it will not move further. If the majority says they are in support, the bill will move to the next stage. The next stage is with the presiding officer. The Speaker will now refer the bill to the relevant committee he deems fit to organise a public hearing to seek public participation and expert opinions.

Do you think the controversial bill proposing life pensions for ex-governors and their deputies is necessary considering the high rate of unemployment and poverty in the land?

Well, I wonder if this is the first time you are hearing about pension bill for ex-governors and their deputies. If it is not the first time, then as a journalist this question would have come up in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2017 when it was amended. All we are doing is that a bill has been brought for us to amend an existing law; going back to why the framers did so is just like asking me about the constitution when I wasn’t a member of the constitution drafting committee. When you get to a stage, you take it from where you met it and move it from there. If people had called for this repeal earlier, it would have been a different ball game completely. Talking about security vote, it is not in my place to start talking about how the security vote is spent. How would you feel if a governor leaves office and you see him or her along the street on top of ‘keke’ (tricycle)? Is that how it should be? What is bad in providing a fallback thing for somebody in office so that he can be encouraged to serve diligently, knowing that when he leaves office, he won’t be abandoned.

Advertisement

Enugu State has not paid retired primary school teachers and local government workers’ gratuities and pensions since 2005, while those of civil servants also have not been paid since 2009. Shouldn’t this bother the House more than the ex-governors pension bill?

The issue of pensions and gratuities didn’t start today. I am not speaking for the executive but as a leader of the House who knows what is happening within the system. The present government earmarked a minimum of N100m every month for this purpose, meaning that depending on the receipt of Internally Generated Revenue or federal allocation, it could be higher. Then a system brought to bear for fairness is FIFO – First In, First Out. So, the government is not insensitive. Are the former governors not our people, just like the pensioners and our constituents? Do we have to ostracise them for having served? This is why a lot of people who are in business wouldn’t even want to leave their comfort zone to come into government. The earlier we start encouraging such people to come, the better for everybody because nobody gives what he or she doesn’t have.

At the last plenary, you moved that the bill be stepped down and it was stepped down following the outcry. Are you going to reintroduce it or commence repealing the existing law following public outcry?

I don’t know what will be the outcome during the second reading and this is the beauty of democracy. I am baffled that people are even drawing conclusions as though we have passed this bill into a law. The beauty of democracy is what we are doing now, and that is how we enrich our democracy. So there is no cause for alarm; we are sent by the people. We are not insensitive because if we were, we would have gone ahead with what we proposed; we would have gone ahead with the second reading. But we decided to look at it critically again due to the outcry it generated. The worrisome thing is that people haven’t even seen the details of the bill, for example, the people that came on peaceful demonstration at the House of Assembly. Their leader said he didn’t know the details of the bill. Can you imagine you do not know the details of the bill and you are already carrying placards? If you don’t have the relevant information, you will end up with a wrong conclusion.

Would the House consider that after leaving office, some of these former governors and deputy governors go to the Senate, while some get appointments as ministers and ambassadors. Would the state still be paying them these humongous pensions while receiving salaries from other government agencies?

Advertisement

I am not the House of Assembly; when we get to the bridge, we will cross it. I cannot say what the House is going to do or not do. The fact remains that there is a superior law with regards to that. I am also aware that people are saying that there is a court judgement on that. So the superior law will always prevail. If it is illegal, of course, it will not be done. It is as simple as that.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Anambra APC Crisis Deepens as Anosike Group Warns Against Secretariat Takeover by Rival Faction

Published

on

By Okey Maduforo, Awka
The leadership crisis rocking the Anambra State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) escalated on Sunday as a factional executive led by Chief Ifeanyi Osegbo reportedly moved to take over the party’s state secretariat in Awka.
However, the executive led by Senator Emma Anosike described the move as unlawful and warned party members against attending any meeting convened by the rival faction.
The dispute stems from a Federal High Court judgment which the Osegbo faction claims affirmed its leadership. The Anosike camp, however, insists the judgment has been misrepresented, describing it as flawed and arguing that neither Senator Emma Anosike nor the party’s State Secretary was joined as a party in the suit. According to the group, the National Working Committee (NWC) and the APC National Chairman were the only defendants in the case.
The Anosike-led executive further argued that any attempt by the Osegbo faction to take over the state secretariat must first be backed by the National Working Committee, which it said remains the only authority empowered to effect such a change.
The group also maintained that security agencies, including personnel deployed by the Inspector-General of Police, continue to recognise Senator Emma Anosike as the authentic chairman of the party in Anambra State.
Despite this, members of the Osegbo faction reportedly arrived at the party secretariat on Sunday to assume control, although the keys to the offices remain in the custody of the Anosike-led executive.
Defending the move, the faction’s Legal Adviser, Barrister Rich Egenti, insisted that the court judgment had already been fully executed.
“There is nothing left to stay. Mere filing of a stay of execution at the Court of Appeal after full execution of the judgment does not amount to a stay. Those challenging the judgment should approach the Court of Appeal and obtain the appropriate order instead of circulating propaganda,” Egenti said.
He added that the Chief Registrar of the Federal High Court had acknowledged that the execution process had been concluded.
“Any attempt by any person or group to stop the lawful assembly of the Anambra APC will be deemed contemptuous and illegal and shall be vehemently resisted,” he stated.
Responding, the Anosike-led executive said it had already taken all necessary legal steps to challenge the judgment.
In a statement, the group noted that Chief Ifeanyi Osegbo did not contest for any position during the last state congresses, including the office of state chairman.
“Our legal team has filed the necessary applications, including a stay of execution and an appeal before the Court of Appeal,” the statement read.
The group further claimed that the APC national leadership had also appealed the judgment and continued to recognise Senator Emma Anosike as the party’s state chairman.
“We remain confident that the courts will determine the issues in accordance with the law. It is also on record that the Inspector-General of Police and other security agencies are investigating allegations of document forgery which allegedly misled the court into delivering the judgment,” the statement added.
The Anosike faction urged party members to remain calm, law-abiding and refrain from attending meetings convened by any leadership other than that led by Senator Emma Anosike, Hon. J.C. Okeke and Sir Obi Okpala, whom it described as the duly elected and inaugurated executives of the party in Anambra State.
On July 3, the faction filed a notice of appeal and an application for a stay of execution before the Court of Appeal, Abuja.
In the appeal, Senator Emma Anosike, Sir Obi Okpala and other elected executive members are seeking an order setting aside the June 24, 2026 judgment delivered by Justice M.G. Umar, describing the proceedings as a nullity.
The appellants also asked the appellate court to stay the execution of the judgment pending the determination of their application.
Among the grounds of appeal are alleged non-service of court processes, denial of fair hearing, misrepresentation in obtaining the judgment, forum shopping, issue estoppel, and the court’s jurisdiction to set aside a judgment alleged to be a nullity.

Continue Reading

Politics

APC faces backlash over revised National Assembly candidate list  

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has come under criticism following its decision to alter the list of candidates that emerged from its National Assembly primaries, sparking fresh concerns over internal democracy and the credibility of its candidate selection process ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Opposition parties condemned the move, with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) accusing the ruling party of descending into confusion, the Labour Party (LP) describing the substitutions as undemocratic, and the Social Democratic Party (SDP) branding the action reckless.
The APC, however, defended the changes, insisting they reflected fairness and the wishes of party members. It also urged opposition parties to focus on resolving their own internal crises rather than commenting on its affairs.
The controversy followed the APC’s directive to its state chapters to submit the final list of candidates for the 2027 elections while issuing Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) nomination forms for completion.
Several aspirants who were initially declared winners alleged that they were replaced after the party’s May Primary Election Appeal Commission reviewed petitions arising from the primaries.
Reports indicate that the APC National Working Committee (NWC), acting on the appeal committee’s recommendations, overturned the victories of several senatorial candidates in nine states and restored six serving senators to the party’s final list.
Those reinstated include Sunday Karimi (Kogi West), Emmanuel Udende (Benue North-East), Titus Zam (Benue North-West), Shuaibu Isa Lau (Taraba North), Adeniyi Adegbonmire (Ondo Central), and Olajide Ipinsagba (Ondo North). In Abia South, Prince Paul Ikonne replaced Edinburgh Erondu.
Among those affected was former Benue State Governor Gabriel Suswam, whose earlier victory in the Benue North-East primary was nullified in favour of incumbent Senator Emmanuel Udende.
The revised list has since generated internal disagreements and raised legal questions, particularly in light of INEC’s warning that it would reject the names of candidates who did not emerge from primaries monitored by the commission.
Reacting to the development, PDP National Publicity Secretary, Jungudo Mohammed, described the changes as evidence of growing confusion within the APC, saying the opposition would take advantage of the situation ahead of the elections.
“With the change of the candidate list, there is confusion in the APC. Let them remain in confusion so that we can take advantage of it and reclaim power. It is not our duty to advise them on how to put their house in order,” he said.
The Labour Party also criticised the substitutions, insisting that candidates who emerge from valid primaries should not be replaced.
LP National Publicity Secretary, Ken Asogwa, said the party had consistently respected the outcome of its primaries, describing the APC’s action as a mockery of the Electoral Act and democratic principles.
“For us in the Labour Party, we have never removed the names of people who won our primaries and replaced them with those who did not. That is how democracy should be practised,” Asogwa said.
However, the National Coordinator of the Obidient Movement Worldwide, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, argued that political parties have the constitutional right to determine their candidates through internal mechanisms.
He noted that the Supreme Court had affirmed the authority of political parties to nominate candidates and stressed the need for aggrieved members to pursue available internal appeal and reconciliation processes.
Similarly, the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) defended the APC’s action. Its National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, said the Electoral Act empowers political parties to manage their candidate selection process, including addressing irregularities through internal mechanisms.
He maintained that if a party identifies flaws in its primary process and opts to make adjustments in line with its constitution, it is within its rights to do so, while denying allegations that the NDC had imposed candidates.

Continue Reading

Politics

Oyo Govt Denies Paying Ransom for Abducted Pupils, Teachers

Published

on

The Oyo State Government has denied reports claiming it paid ransom to secure the release of pupils and teachers abducted by bandits in Oriire Local Government Area, describing the allegation as false and misleading.

In a statement issued on Friday, the Commissioner for Information, Dotun Oyelade, said the claim was “far from the truth” and accused “irresponsible bloggers” of deliberately spreading misinformation to confuse the public.

“Although both the Oyo State and Federal Governments have been making concerted efforts to secure the safe release of the abducted children and their teachers, no ransom has been paid to the bandits, either directly or indirectly,” Oyelade stated.

He urged residents to disregard the reports and rely only on information released through official government channels.

The commissioner added that the Oyo State Government is working closely with security agencies to ensure the safe release of the abductees and bring the incident to a successful conclusion.

The pupils and teachers were abducted on May 15 when armed bandits attacked three schools in the Yawota and Ahoro-Esienle communities of Oriire Local Government Area. The coordinated attack also claimed the life of a teacher.

The victims have remained in captivity since the attack, while the Oyo State Government, the Federal Government, and security agencies continue efforts to secure their freedom.

Continue Reading

Politics

APGA Debunks Claims of Protest Vote by Aggrieved Aspirants

Published

on

By Okey Maduforo, Awka
The All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) has dismissed reports that aggrieved aspirants who lost the party’s primary elections are plotting to work against its candidates in the 2027 general elections.
Following the conclusion of the party’s primaries a few weeks ago, reports had alleged that some unsuccessful aspirants were considering supporting candidates of other political parties in protest, with the aim of undermining APGA’s chances at the polls.
However, APGA National Publicity Secretary, Mazi Ejimofor Opara, described the claims as false, insisting that the party remains united after a reconciliation meeting convened by Governor Charles Soludo.
“I am hearing this from you. As a party, we have not received any report of such a plot. Let me state clearly that all the aspirants have resolved to work for the success of the party in the 2027 general elections,” Opara said.
He explained that during the meeting held at the Light House in Awka, aspirants and candidates openly discussed issues arising from the primaries, stressing that none of the participants accused the party of conducting an unfair or non-transparent process.
“Everyone expressed their views about the primary elections. No one alleged that the process lacked transparency. The only concern expressed was that each aspirant had hoped to emerge victorious.
“At the end of the meeting, every misunderstanding, anxiety and misgiving surrounding the primaries was resolved, and the party remains one united family,” he added.
Opara also warned opposition parties against what he described as deliberate attempts to spread falsehoods and create disaffection within APGA.
He cautioned individuals engaging in cyberbullying and name-dropping for political purposes to desist, warning that the party would not hesitate to pursue legal action against anyone found defaming its members.
“This is nothing but cheap blackmail by the opposition. They should be mindful of the legal consequences of cyberbullying and name-dropping. We urge our party faithful and the general public to disregard these spurious reports,” he said.
This version improves grammar, flow, attribution, and readability while preserving the substance of the original report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Former Minister Uche Nnaji To Remain In Detention For 14 Days

Published

on

Former Minister Uche Nnaji
The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has secured a court order permitting it to detain former Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji, for an initial 14 days as investigations into alleged certificate forgery continue.

The remand order followed Nnaji’s arrest on Wednesday at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, shortly after he arrived from Enugu aboard a chartered flight.

According to an official of the anti-graft agency, the court-approved remand will enable investigators to interrogate the former minister over the allegations, with the possibility of seeking an extension should further investigation require additional time.

Nnaji was apprehended following the execution of a bench warrant earlier issued by the Federal High Court after he allegedly failed to honour several invitations extended by the commission.

The ICPC subsequently confirmed the arrest in an official statement signed by its spokesperson, John Odey, stating that the former minister is in the commission’s custody as investigations continue into allegations bordering on the forgery of academic credentials and a National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) discharge certificate allegedly submitted during his ministerial screening process.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending