Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

Politics

IMO guber: There must be an end to litigation

Published

on

Maduka University

By Pedro O, Enugu

It was the the Appeal Court sitting in Enugu in a case between APGA senatorial candidate then, Senator Victor Umeh and that of the PDP Uche Ekwunife, that made it clear that there must be an end to litigation.

Ekwunife’s election had been nullified by the Appeal over issues of nomination.

In her desperation, Ekwunife knowing full well that the Appeal held the final say in her matter, decided to try her luck at the Supreme Court calling for a review of the judgment.

Advertisement

Of course. the apex court turned her back and referred her to the appeal Court.

She returned to the Appeal urging them to review their judgment.

The respected justices at the Appeal Court in Enugu did not mince word in telling Ekwunife, the Anambra female Senator that every litigation must have an end.

They reminded her that the Appeal was her final bus stop.

Without conceding to any mistake, the court said “even if there was a mistake in the judgment, it remains  the decision of the court and cannot be changed.

Advertisement

The issue of the IMO guber appears to be following the same way. There have been a constant attempt to exhume a matter that had long be laid to rest by the apex Court.

Whether you like the face of Governor Hope Uzodimma or not, the incontrovertible fact is that he is the executive governor of IMO State and nothing can change that.

His election was sealed by the Supreme Court and that matter was buried by that proclamation.

However, for academic exercise let’s look at the latest attempt by Uche Nwose to resurrect the dead.

Uche-nwosu-Rochas Okorocha’s son in law, has asked the Supreme Court to declare that Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma was not the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) based on the court’s judgment that Nwosu was nominated by both the APC and the Action Alliance.

Advertisement

Nwosu made this request in a fresh suit his counsel, Mr Philip Umeadi Jnr recently filed, asking the apex court to review its judgement in which he declared Uzodinma the APC candidate.

He is relying on an earlier pronouncement of the court that he (Nwosu) was nominated by both APC and AA and consequently declared his nomination a nullity.

In the judgment nullifying his candidacy which he attached to the suit, Justice Amina Augie JSC, made the following findings: “…Apparently, in arguing as he did, the appellant does not seem to grasp or appreciate the intricacies of the case against him.

“The issue was not whether his name was on the ballot paper, or whether he was the APC’s candidate at the general election itself, the issue at stake is whether he knowingly allowed himself to be “nominated” as a candidate by both APC and Action Alliance…

NB: ..THAT THE ISSUE IS NOT WHETHER HE WAS APC’s CANDIDATE.

Advertisement

But…whether he allowed himself to be “nominated ” by two parties…

There was an attempt to present him, whether justly or unjustly as candidate of two parties… was he aware? That was the matter treated by the apex court…

Note that the nominated is in quotes because its alleged veracity has not be proven and not an issue before the court.

Upbtill today, Nwosu has failed, like the apex court pointed out, to understand that the issue was not who was the APC candidate but he was disqualified for claiming double nomination.

Uzodimma who was duly nominated as the APC candidate did not have to waste his time because nobody was challenging his nomination as the APC candidate.

Advertisement

And, the party has not denied him as their candidate.

The issues are thus very clear.
There was no issue as to who was the duly nominated candidate of the APC.
The Supreme Court never ruled on who was the APC candidate because the matter was not brought before it.
The Court ruled on alleged double nomination. Howsoever Nwosu got his name to INEC was not an issue before the court.
Also, nobody challenged the candidacy of Uzodimma as APC candidate and the party has said that they sponsored him in the election.
Like I said, whatever argument for or against the above are mere academic exercises. The Apex Court is the final bus stop for all cases.
The same Court has ruled on this matter and that’s final.
Those dreaming should wake up and prepare for future election. This one is over as the Supreme Court cannot overrule itself.
THERE MUST BE AN END TO LITIGATION!!!!

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Ebonyi Guber: ‘Our People Deserve Better Government,’ Odii Insists

Published

on

Maduka University

By Petrus Obi, London

London — The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Ebonyi State, Ifeanyi Odii, has intensified his criticism of the administration of Governor Francis Nwifuru, insisting that the people of the state deserve a different approach to governance.

Odii, who spoke with EverydayNewsngr.net in London, said what he described as the “fire brigade approach” of the Nwifuru administration was not the kind of governance Ebonyi needs.

According to him, the state requires a government with a clear vision, long-term planning and the capacity to deliver meaningful development to its people.

“The fire brigade approach of the Nwifuru government is not what the state needs,” Odii said.

He added: “I am coming to bring a new lease of life to my people.”

Odii’s comments come amid renewed political debate in Ebonyi State following the recent removal of the state Commissioner for Works. The development has attracted attention from opposition circles, with critics using it to question aspects of the administration’s handling of governance and infrastructure.

The PDP chieftain said the people of Ebonyi should expect more than what he described as reactive governance, arguing that development should be driven by a coherent programme capable of producing lasting results.

He maintained that his political ambition was motivated by a desire to provide what he described as purposeful leadership and improve the welfare of residents across the state.

“We deserve better government in Ebonyi State,” Odii said, stressing that his vision was centred on giving the people renewed confidence in government and creating opportunities for them to prosper.

As political activities ahead of the next governorship election continue to gather momentum, governance, infrastructure, accountability and the delivery of public services are expected to feature prominently in the emerging contest.

Odii’s intervention in London is likely to add further momentum to the political conversation, particularly as opposition figures seek to distinguish their vision for Ebonyi from that of the incumbent administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

EBONYI 2027: The People, Not Individuals Will Decide Who Becomes Governor – Igwe

Published

on

Maduka University

STATEMENT BY CHIEF EMMANUEL CHIDI IGWE,

SPOKESPERSON TO CHIEF DR. IFEANYI CHUKWUMA ODII

The 2027 governorship election in Ebonyi State is not a family affair, nor is it a matter to be decided by one individual or political godfather. It is a democratic contest, and Ebonyians will ultimately decide who becomes their governor through the ballot box.
No aspirant should be expected to step down simply because another politician believes he should. Every qualified candidate has the right to contest, present his programme and seek the mandate of the people.
Let me make this clear: since Senator Dave Umahi did not bring Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii into the governorship race, he cannot now claim the authority to ask him to step down. Chief Odii has his own political identity, supporters, convictions and legitimate right to seek the mandate of Ebonyians.
The decision to contest or withdraw belongs to the candidate, while the ultimate decision on who governs Ebonyi State belongs to the people.
The 2027 election should therefore be about issues, programmes, records, accountability and the future of Ebonyi—not political arrangements made by individuals behind closed doors.
Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii is prepared to place his vision and programme before Ebonyians and subject them to public scrutiny. Those seeking to retain power should equally be prepared to defend their records before the electorate.
Ebonyi 2027 is not a family arrangement. It is a contest for the confidence of the people. The people of Ebonyi State—not individuals—will have the final say.
Chief Emmanuel Chidi Igwe
Spokesperson to Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING: SaharaReporters Report on Arrest of Enugu Traditional Ruler, Ex-Lawmaker Is False and Misleading

Published

on

Maduka University

The recent publication by SaharaReporters alleging that prominent Enugu traditional ruler, Igwe Obiora Igwesi, his brother and former federal lawmaker, Hon. Uchenna Sunday A. Igwesi (USA Igwesi), and eight others were arrested over an alleged attack on an NDC ward meeting in Obuoffia, Nkanu West Local Government Area, is false and deeply misleading.

The report is being described as a deliberate attempt to damage the reputation of respected leaders in Enugu State and create unnecessary political tension ahead of the 2027 elections.

Contrary to the claims contained in the publication, there was no arrest ordered by the Inspector-General of Police against Igwe Obiora Igwesi, Hon. USA Igwesi, or the other individuals named in connection with any alleged attack on an NDC meeting. There was also no operation by detectives from Zone 13 Command, Ukpo, Dunukofia, Anambra State, as alleged in the report.

Similarly, the purported petition dated September 15, 2026, and the allegations of conspiracy, unlawful possession of firearms, attempted murder, assault, threatening violence and stealing are strongly disputed and described as fabricated claims intended to create a damaging narrative around the individuals concerned.

The broader allegation that the 17 Local Government Areas of Enugu State have experienced coordinated armed attacks allegedly sponsored by Local Government Chairmen to silence the opposition is equally rejected as unfounded.

Attempts to associate Igwe Obiora Igwesi and Hon. USA Igwesi with criminal activity or political violence are viewed as an unacceptable effort to tarnish the image of individuals who have served their communities and contributed to the development of Enugu State.

The public, particularly the people of Enugu State, is therefore urged to exercise caution and verify the facts independently before accepting or circulating the allegations contained in the SaharaReporters publication.

Enugu State remains focused on peace, stability and development. Political disagreements should not be allowed to degenerate into the circulation of unverified allegations capable of inflaming tensions or damaging the reputations of individuals.

The position being maintained by the affected parties is clear: there was no arrest of the named individuals in connection with the alleged incident, no evidence has been presented establishing that any Local Government Chairman sponsored an attack, and the allegations contained in the publication are disputed in their entirety.

The public is encouraged to await verifiable facts from the appropriate authorities rather than rely on claims that have not been independently substantiated.

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP Enugu Ticket: Did Nnaji’s Running Mate Violate Electoral Act?

Published

on

Maduka University

Fresh legal questions emerge over Chijioke Ugwu’s membership registration after Supreme Court restores party-register provisions
By Our Correspondent

Fresh legal questions have emerged over the Peoples Democratic Party’s 2027 governorship ticket in Enugu State following the Supreme Court’s restoration of key provisions of the Electoral Act dealing with political party membership registers and the conduct of primaries.

The questions centre on Chief Chijioke Peter Ugwu, who was recently announced by the PDP governorship candidate, Chief Uche Geoffrey Nnaji, as his running mate.

Nnaji announced Ugwu’s selection on September 24, shortly after the Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment restoring Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026. Ugwu’s selection was subsequently reported by several Nigerian media outlets.

But documents and information available to this newspaper raise a question that could potentially become significant if the PDP ticket is challenged in court.

The PDP governorship primary in Enugu State was conducted on May 25, 2026.

However, Ugwu is understood to have registered as a PDP member on May 31, 2026 — six days after the governorship primary.

This means that if the May 31 registration date is accurately reflected in the party’s official records, his name could not have appeared in the PDP membership register submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) before the May 25 governorship primary.

That immediately raises the question:

Can a person who was not a member of the party on the date of its governorship primary subsequently be selected as the deputy governorship candidate without the Supreme Court’s restored membership-register provisions affecting the ticket?

What the Supreme Court restored
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous judgment delivered on September 24, set aside the Court of Appeal’s earlier decision which had declared the disputed provisions of the Electoral Act unconstitutional.

The apex court upheld the validity of Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), following an appeal by INEC against the Court of Appeal judgment in the case involving the Zenith Labour Party.

Section 77(5) provides that only persons whose names are contained in a political party’s membership register submitted to INEC at least 21 days before a primary, congress or convention may participate in the exercise.

Section 77(6) requires political parties to use the membership register submitted to INEC for their primaries, congresses and conventions.

Section 77(7) deals with the consequence of failure by a party to submit its membership register within the prescribed period.

These provisions are now back in force following the Supreme Court judgment. Legal opinions suggest that the law’s insistence on the membership register submitted to INEC is relevant to the validity of the party’s eventual nomination process, depending on how the PDP formally nominated and submitted its governorship and deputy governorship candidates.

The precise documents will therefore be crucial.

Among the questions likely to arise are:

What date did the PDP submit its membership register to INEC?
Was Ugwu’s name contained in that register?
When exactly did Ugwu become a registered PDP member?
Was he a PDP member before the register was submitted to INEC?
How did the PDP formally nominate him as running mate?
Was the nomination made through a procedure recognised by the Electoral Act and the party’s constitution?
The controversy is coming at a sensitive time for the PDP, which has only recently unveiled Ugwu as Nnaji’s running mate. Ugwu, from Nguru in Nsukka Local Government Area, is an entrepreneur, philanthropist and community leader who runs businesses in logistics, contracting, consultancy and hospitality.

However, the governorship candidate and the deputy governorship candidate constitute a single electoral ticket. Therefore, any legal or constitutional issue affecting the eligibility of the deputy governorship candidate automatically has implications for the validity of the joint ticket, including the governorship candidate.

Another legal opinion available to this newspaper insists that “the gubernatorial ticket is a joint one. If the name of a deputy governor is not on the digital register, it invalidates the entire process.”

In the 2019 Bayelsa governorship election, APC’s David Lyon was declared winner. His running mate was Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo.

The Supreme Court later disqualified Degi-Eremienyo over the documents he submitted to INEC. The crucial point was that the Supreme Court held that his disqualification affected the joint ticket he shared with David Lyon. Consequently, the court ordered INEC to withdraw the Certificate of Return issued to Lyon and his deputy.

This happened one day before Lyon was due to be sworn in as governor. The certificate was subsequently issued to Douye Diri of the PDP, who had the next-highest lawful votes and the required geographical spread.

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC Announces PVC Collection as Onwuegbu Supporters Mobilise Constituents

Published

on

Maduka University

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced that the collection of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) will commence nationwide on October 9.

The development has prompted calls for eligible voters to visit the INEC office in their respective Local Government Areas to collect their PVCs and ensure they are prepared to participate in the electoral process.

Meanwhile, supporters of Hon. Engr. Anayo Onwuegbu, Omeiheukwu Akpugoeze, have urged constituents in the Aninri/Awgu/Oji River Federal Constituency to support his bid for a second term in the Federal House of Representatives.

The supporters made the appeal while encouraging eligible residents to collect their PVCs and exercise their franchise in the forthcoming election.

Voters are advised to follow official INEC guidelines and verify the applicable collection procedures and dates before visiting their designated collection centres.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending