Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

Politics

Enugu: Udi/Agbudu ward passes vote of confidence on APC State Chairman, Agballah

Published

on

Maduka University
The All Progressives Congress (APC), Udi/Agbudu ward, in Udi local government area of Enugu state has passed a vote of confidence on Chief Ugochukwu  Agballah as the state chairman of the party.
The ward dismissed as fake and unfounded the recent news in the social media about a purported expulsion of the state chairman, Agballah, who is also from the ward.
The ward also passed a vote of confidence on the party’s Chairman in Udi/Agbudu ward, Mr. Clinton Chinedu Ezeago and his executive.
Rising from an emergency ward meeting attended by more than 1000 members, the party described as strange the recent reports in the social media purporting the expulsion of the state chairman by “unknown” ward chairman and secretary.

Hon. Clinton Chinedu Ezeago, Chairman of APC Udi/Agbudu Ward, reading communiqué at the end of emergency ward meeting yesterday.

The party said that one Ferdinand Aduma and Francis Onyia, who are signatories to the purported expulsion letter are known members of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), being used to cause distraction in the APC as the ruling PDP was afraid of the growing popularity and acceptance of APC in the state.
The party members insisted that the persons behind the expulsion letter are not members of the APC in Udi/Agbudu ward.
They alleged that the PDP was daily financing ludicrous crisis using willing individuals, stressing that PDP was relying on strategies it has used in the past to destabilise APC in the state.
In a communique issued at the end of the meeting and jointly signed by the APC Chairman, Udi/Agbudu ward , Chinedu Ezeago and Secretary, Chinedu Onyia, the party faithful maintained that no sane member or executive of the party, except those who are afraid of APC’s impending victory, would nurse the idea of expelling the state chairman of the party few months to election.
They said there was never a time members of the party deliberated on issues concerning the state chairman neither was there any disciplinary committee set up to take disciplinary action against the state chairman of the party.

Chief Felix Ebubeagu Okafor, a chieftain of APC in Enugu state speaking at the  emergency meeting of Udi/Agbudu Ward, Udi

While describing the “phantom” expulsion as laughable, the party said, the action of the two fake individuals masquerading as APC ward executives, and who signed the purported suspension letter, showed they have no knowledge of the party’s constitution.
The communique stated that Section 21.3 Vi (b) of the APC 26th March 2022 Constitution, as amended, stipulates that if there is any report against a member at the ward level, the local government area executive shall be the adjudicators stressing that the ward executive lacks the powers to look into any complaint at the ward level.
They observed that the said “debarment, suspension and expulsion” letter did not state or allege any offence committed by the state chairman.
While declaring the letter as “ill-conceived”, they urged members of the public to discountenance the fictitious and false debarment, suspension and expulsion as the letter did not emanate from APC Udi/ Agbudu ward.
The motion for vote of confidence on the state chairman, Agballah as well as the Udi/Agbudu ward leadership was moved by Hon. Patrick Eneh, while Chief Onah Livinus Chukwunwike seconded.
The communique reads in full:
“We, the members of APC , Udi/Agbudu ward at our emergency ward meeting held on Tuesday, 23 August 2020 at Eke Udi Square do hereby disclaim the false and purported expulsion, suspension and debarment of our performing and illustrious son as a member of APC, Udi/Agbudu ward and Chairman of APC, Enugu State, as stated in a widely publicised letter dated 19th August 2022 and signed by two characters who completely unknown to the party”.
“The signatories, Mr. Ferdinand Aduma and Mr. Francis Onyia, and not ward Chairman and Ward Secretary respectively of APC, Udi/Agbudu ward. Our chairman is Mr. Clinton Chinedu Ezeago and our ward secretary is Mr. Francis Chinedu Onyia. Mr. Ferdinand Aduma and Mr. Francis Onyia are not members of APC and have never attended any of our meetings since 23rd February 2022. This can be verified from party’s attendance register.  Their names are not and have never appeared on our party’s attendance register. Both left the party prior to the 23rd February 2022 councillorship election and are known members of PDP Udi/ Agbudu award. Mr. Ferdinand Aduma and Mr. Francis Onyia have both joined PDP since February 2022 having openly campaigned, voted and worked for PDP during the chairmanship and councillorship election of 23 February 2022. Which sane APC party members or executives of APC will be  suspending, expelling and debarring their most hard working state chairman few months to election, if not those who are afraid of the impending victory at the polls. This impending APC victory is made possible by the competent, capable and foresighted state chairman. There was never a meeting of APC Udi/Agbudu ward where the issue of suspension, debarment or expulsion or otherwise of our state chairman, the Honorable Ugochuckwu Agballah was ever raised or anytime, any manner of report was raised against him or any disciplinary committee set up on such a report or disciplinary action taken, as our state Chairman has not committed any infractions against the constitution of the party. We met last week on Wednesday 17th August 2022. The meeting was recorded on video and the minutes captured in our minutes notebook.
“At that meeting, we had 248 members in attendance and nobody raised the issue of any report whatsoever against our hardworking state chairman. From a careful reading of the laughable and phantom expulsion letter, one can deduce that the writers of the debarment suspension and expulsion letter are not conversant with the Constitution or procedure for disciplinary actions as contained in our party’s constitution. Section 21.3vi(b) of the APC 26 March 2022  constitution as amended stipulates that, if there is a report against a member at the ward level, the local government area executive shall be the adjudicators. Therefore, the ward executive lacks the power to look into any complaint or the word level. Ignorance of the party constitution explains why the writers debarred, suspended and expelled at the same time”.
Secondly, no reason was given for such an action, and neither was any offense alleged or stated in the ill-conceived fake letter. Since the election of  Honorable Ugochuckwu Agballah as the state chairman, our party in Udi/Agbudu award has recorded membership increased to 2450 from the former membership of less than 100 members. This increase is due singularly to his financial support, popularity and unquantifiable mobilization efforts, not to talk of his wide acceptance by the entire community.
“The leadership of PDP is worried over the growing acceptance of APC in  Enugu state, and is daily financing ludicrous crisis using PDP moles in APC. This is one of the strategies PDP used in destabilizing APC in the past using the same characters who organized this failed putsch.”
“We the entire executive and members of the APC Udi/Agbudu ward, do hereby urged the public to discountenance, the fictitious and false debarment, suspension and expulsion as the letter did not emanate from Udi/Agbudu ward”.
“We also reaffirm our unalloyed support and confidence on the membership of our illustrious, competent, capable result-driven son, leader,  revolutionary ,dynamic, loved and loving statesmen-like, savior of the downtrodden masses of Enugu state,  the dread of looters and corrupt politicians, the fear of fifth columnists and comprador agents of PDP in APC”.
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

2027: Odii Will Not Step Down, Says Spokesperson

Published

on

Maduka University

ABAKALIKI — The camp of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate, Chief Dr Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii, has dismissed reports suggesting that he may withdraw from the 2027 Ebonyi State governorship race and support Governor Francis Nwifuru.

In a statement signed by Odii’s spokesperson, Chief Emmanuel Chidi Igwe, the campaign described the reported withdrawal as false, insisting that Odii remains committed to contesting the election.

According to Igwe, “Chief Dr Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii will never, under any condition, step down from the 2027 governorship contest.”

The statement said Odii’s political camp remains focused on what it described as its campaign position: “Odii must run and win.”

It added that any political discussions, persuasion or negotiations involving other individuals should not be interpreted as a decision by Odii to abandon his governorship ambition.

Advertisement

Camp Rejects Withdrawal Narrative

The Odii camp further described reports of a possible withdrawal as a political narrative allegedly being promoted by individuals opposed to his candidacy.

Igwe challenged those behind the reports to produce evidence showing that Odii had personally announced his withdrawal from the race.

“There is a fundamental difference between reporting that a politician intends to persuade Chief Odii to withdraw and reporting that Chief Odii has agreed to withdraw,” the statement said, stressing that the latter would require evidence from the candidate himself.

The spokesperson also urged journalists, bloggers and online publishers to maintain professional standards when reporting political developments, warning against presenting speculation or the intentions of third parties as established decisions by political candidates.

Advertisement

24-Hour Retraction Demand

The camp has consequently demanded that publishers of the alleged withdrawal story retract or prominently correct their reports within 24 hours, unless they can produce an authentic statement from Odii confirming that he has decided to withdraw from the 2027 contest.

The statement also reminded online publishers of their responsibilities under Nigerian law, citing the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act 2015, as amended, as well as other laws relating to unlawful online publications and defamatory material.

The spokesperson clarified that the reference to the law was not intended as a threat against legitimate journalism or political criticism, but as a reminder that political disagreements should remain within the bounds of the law.

The statement concluded by reaffirming that Odii remains in the 2027 governorship race and urged members of the public to regard reports of his withdrawal as unverified unless supported by a direct statement from him.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ebonyi Guber: ‘Our People Deserve Better Government,’ Odii Insists

Published

on

Maduka University

By Petrus Obi, London

London — The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Ebonyi State, Ifeanyi Odii, has intensified his criticism of the administration of Governor Francis Nwifuru, insisting that the people of the state deserve a different approach to governance.

Odii, who spoke with EverydayNewsngr.net in London, said what he described as the “fire brigade approach” of the Nwifuru administration was not the kind of governance Ebonyi needs.

According to him, the state requires a government with a clear vision, long-term planning and the capacity to deliver meaningful development to its people.

“The fire brigade approach of the Nwifuru government is not what the state needs,” Odii said.

Advertisement

He added: “I am coming to bring a new lease of life to my people.”

Odii’s comments come amid renewed political debate in Ebonyi State following the recent removal of the state Commissioner for Works. The development has attracted attention from opposition circles, with critics using it to question aspects of the administration’s handling of governance and infrastructure.

The PDP chieftain said the people of Ebonyi should expect more than what he described as reactive governance, arguing that development should be driven by a coherent programme capable of producing lasting results.

He maintained that his political ambition was motivated by a desire to provide what he described as purposeful leadership and improve the welfare of residents across the state.

“We deserve better government in Ebonyi State,” Odii said, stressing that his vision was centred on giving the people renewed confidence in government and creating opportunities for them to prosper.

Advertisement

As political activities ahead of the next governorship election continue to gather momentum, governance, infrastructure, accountability and the delivery of public services are expected to feature prominently in the emerging contest.

Odii’s intervention in London is likely to add further momentum to the political conversation, particularly as opposition figures seek to distinguish their vision for Ebonyi from that of the incumbent administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

EBONYI 2027: The People, Not Individuals Will Decide Who Becomes Governor – Igwe

Published

on

Maduka University

STATEMENT BY CHIEF EMMANUEL CHIDI IGWE,

SPOKESPERSON TO CHIEF DR. IFEANYI CHUKWUMA ODII

The 2027 governorship election in Ebonyi State is not a family affair, nor is it a matter to be decided by one individual or political godfather. It is a democratic contest, and Ebonyians will ultimately decide who becomes their governor through the ballot box.
No aspirant should be expected to step down simply because another politician believes he should. Every qualified candidate has the right to contest, present his programme and seek the mandate of the people.
Let me make this clear: since Senator Dave Umahi did not bring Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii into the governorship race, he cannot now claim the authority to ask him to step down. Chief Odii has his own political identity, supporters, convictions and legitimate right to seek the mandate of Ebonyians.
The decision to contest or withdraw belongs to the candidate, while the ultimate decision on who governs Ebonyi State belongs to the people.
The 2027 election should therefore be about issues, programmes, records, accountability and the future of Ebonyi—not political arrangements made by individuals behind closed doors.
Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii is prepared to place his vision and programme before Ebonyians and subject them to public scrutiny. Those seeking to retain power should equally be prepared to defend their records before the electorate.
Ebonyi 2027 is not a family arrangement. It is a contest for the confidence of the people. The people of Ebonyi State—not individuals—will have the final say.
Chief Emmanuel Chidi Igwe
Spokesperson to Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING: SaharaReporters Report on Arrest of Enugu Traditional Ruler, Ex-Lawmaker Is False and Misleading

Published

on

Maduka University

The recent publication by SaharaReporters alleging that prominent Enugu traditional ruler, Igwe Obiora Igwesi, his brother and former federal lawmaker, Hon. Uchenna Sunday A. Igwesi (USA Igwesi), and eight others were arrested over an alleged attack on an NDC ward meeting in Obuoffia, Nkanu West Local Government Area, is false and deeply misleading.

The report is being described as a deliberate attempt to damage the reputation of respected leaders in Enugu State and create unnecessary political tension ahead of the 2027 elections.

Contrary to the claims contained in the publication, there was no arrest ordered by the Inspector-General of Police against Igwe Obiora Igwesi, Hon. USA Igwesi, or the other individuals named in connection with any alleged attack on an NDC meeting. There was also no operation by detectives from Zone 13 Command, Ukpo, Dunukofia, Anambra State, as alleged in the report.

Similarly, the purported petition dated September 15, 2026, and the allegations of conspiracy, unlawful possession of firearms, attempted murder, assault, threatening violence and stealing are strongly disputed and described as fabricated claims intended to create a damaging narrative around the individuals concerned.

The broader allegation that the 17 Local Government Areas of Enugu State have experienced coordinated armed attacks allegedly sponsored by Local Government Chairmen to silence the opposition is equally rejected as unfounded.

Advertisement

Attempts to associate Igwe Obiora Igwesi and Hon. USA Igwesi with criminal activity or political violence are viewed as an unacceptable effort to tarnish the image of individuals who have served their communities and contributed to the development of Enugu State.

The public, particularly the people of Enugu State, is therefore urged to exercise caution and verify the facts independently before accepting or circulating the allegations contained in the SaharaReporters publication.

Enugu State remains focused on peace, stability and development. Political disagreements should not be allowed to degenerate into the circulation of unverified allegations capable of inflaming tensions or damaging the reputations of individuals.

The position being maintained by the affected parties is clear: there was no arrest of the named individuals in connection with the alleged incident, no evidence has been presented establishing that any Local Government Chairman sponsored an attack, and the allegations contained in the publication are disputed in their entirety.

The public is encouraged to await verifiable facts from the appropriate authorities rather than rely on claims that have not been independently substantiated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

PDP Enugu Ticket: Did Nnaji’s Running Mate Violate Electoral Act?

Published

on

Maduka University

Fresh legal questions emerge over Chijioke Ugwu’s membership registration after Supreme Court restores party-register provisions
By Our Correspondent

Fresh legal questions have emerged over the Peoples Democratic Party’s 2027 governorship ticket in Enugu State following the Supreme Court’s restoration of key provisions of the Electoral Act dealing with political party membership registers and the conduct of primaries.

The questions centre on Chief Chijioke Peter Ugwu, who was recently announced by the PDP governorship candidate, Chief Uche Geoffrey Nnaji, as his running mate.

Nnaji announced Ugwu’s selection on September 24, shortly after the Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment restoring Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026. Ugwu’s selection was subsequently reported by several Nigerian media outlets.

But documents and information available to this newspaper raise a question that could potentially become significant if the PDP ticket is challenged in court.

Advertisement

The PDP governorship primary in Enugu State was conducted on May 25, 2026.

However, Ugwu is understood to have registered as a PDP member on May 31, 2026 — six days after the governorship primary.

This means that if the May 31 registration date is accurately reflected in the party’s official records, his name could not have appeared in the PDP membership register submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) before the May 25 governorship primary.

That immediately raises the question:

Can a person who was not a member of the party on the date of its governorship primary subsequently be selected as the deputy governorship candidate without the Supreme Court’s restored membership-register provisions affecting the ticket?

Advertisement

What the Supreme Court restored
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous judgment delivered on September 24, set aside the Court of Appeal’s earlier decision which had declared the disputed provisions of the Electoral Act unconstitutional.

The apex court upheld the validity of Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), following an appeal by INEC against the Court of Appeal judgment in the case involving the Zenith Labour Party.

Section 77(5) provides that only persons whose names are contained in a political party’s membership register submitted to INEC at least 21 days before a primary, congress or convention may participate in the exercise.

Section 77(6) requires political parties to use the membership register submitted to INEC for their primaries, congresses and conventions.

Section 77(7) deals with the consequence of failure by a party to submit its membership register within the prescribed period.

Advertisement

These provisions are now back in force following the Supreme Court judgment. Legal opinions suggest that the law’s insistence on the membership register submitted to INEC is relevant to the validity of the party’s eventual nomination process, depending on how the PDP formally nominated and submitted its governorship and deputy governorship candidates.

The precise documents will therefore be crucial.

Among the questions likely to arise are:

What date did the PDP submit its membership register to INEC?
Was Ugwu’s name contained in that register?
When exactly did Ugwu become a registered PDP member?
Was he a PDP member before the register was submitted to INEC?
How did the PDP formally nominate him as running mate?
Was the nomination made through a procedure recognised by the Electoral Act and the party’s constitution?
The controversy is coming at a sensitive time for the PDP, which has only recently unveiled Ugwu as Nnaji’s running mate. Ugwu, from Nguru in Nsukka Local Government Area, is an entrepreneur, philanthropist and community leader who runs businesses in logistics, contracting, consultancy and hospitality.

However, the governorship candidate and the deputy governorship candidate constitute a single electoral ticket. Therefore, any legal or constitutional issue affecting the eligibility of the deputy governorship candidate automatically has implications for the validity of the joint ticket, including the governorship candidate.

Advertisement

Another legal opinion available to this newspaper insists that “the gubernatorial ticket is a joint one. If the name of a deputy governor is not on the digital register, it invalidates the entire process.”

In the 2019 Bayelsa governorship election, APC’s David Lyon was declared winner. His running mate was Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo.

The Supreme Court later disqualified Degi-Eremienyo over the documents he submitted to INEC. The crucial point was that the Supreme Court held that his disqualification affected the joint ticket he shared with David Lyon. Consequently, the court ordered INEC to withdraw the Certificate of Return issued to Lyon and his deputy.

This happened one day before Lyon was due to be sworn in as governor. The certificate was subsequently issued to Douye Diri of the PDP, who had the next-highest lawful votes and the required geographical spread.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending