News
Controversial Enugu Centenary Land: A Daniel Has Come To Judgement
The Enugu House of Assembly may not have made headlines for sometime, not because the House has not been sitting or performing it’s constitutional functions but the Media may not have seen weighty decisions to guarantee top spots in the news.
However, the recent report on the controversial Centenary City Land which has claimed some lives was a major decision that has attracted the attention of major media houses across the country.
For a controversy that led to several litigations, muscle flexing, behind the scene manoeuvres involving very prominent and powerful individuals, one could have predicted that even the Obeagu and Amaechi Communities must have had doubts if the Assembly would be able to treat their matter without fear or favour.
But the Assembly came out smoking; delivering a shocking report that can only be described as transparent.
The report of the Special Committee on
Land Matters/Dispute has continued to receive wide commendations across the country.
And the media cannot help but document this landmark report at a time the common man was losing fate in the system.
The Issues At Stake
The petition from Obeagu and Amechi Communities alleged that a private firm, Private Estates International West Africa(PEIWA) used intimidation, harassment, malicious demolition of buildings in order to forcefully takeover their ancestral land despite pending suits in court.
It all started sometime in 1982, when former Governor of Old Anambra State Dr. Jim Nwobodo, a native of Amechi Awkunanaw proposed to site a university within his home community.
He commissioned for Survey works pursuant to the proposed acquisition of an estimated 318.560 hectares of land in certain kindred families in Amechi Uwani and the Obeagu Awkunanaw Community.
Preliminary Survey was done and endorsed by the then Surveyor General, M.U.C Obi dated March 8, 1982 with Tracing No: MISC AN-53 for 318.560 hectares.
However, Jim Nwobodo left office in 1983 and was unable to complete the acquisition and the project.
But a certain Private company, Private Estates International West Africa Limited (PEIWA), entered the land sometime in 2009 in the name of a New Township Development Joint venture with the Government and began to clear the land for the proposed development.
The promoters of the new project allegedly extended the land from 318.560 to over 1097 hectares of their ancestral lands partly belonging to AmechiUwani and the other part to Obeagu Awkunanaw.
While the survey sketch for the proposed Anambra State University of Technology was registered as TRACING NO: MISC AN-53, signed by the then Surveyor General, M.U.C Obi and dated March 8, 1982, a new Survey Plan was purportedly re-scripted to bear PLAN No: EN (A) 594 in favour of the Enugu State University of Technology in 1985 and expanded to 1097 hectares.
PEIWA’s Submissions
Responding to issues raised by the communities, PEIWA said they did not participate in the acquisition of the 1,097.128 hectares of land in 1986.
That on 18/5/2009, they entered into agreement with Enugu State Government named” New Township Development Agreement” (NTDA) to develop a model city on the 1,097.128 hectares in Amechi/Obeagu Communities covered by C of O dated 1/1/2009.
That sequel to the above mentioned agreement, the State Government relinquished to PEIWA the said 1,097.128 hectares of land.
That they took full possession of the land in accordance with the provisions as stipulated in New Township Development Agreement.
Committee Findings
In its findings the Assembly Committee noted that PEIWA was unable to prove that the process of acquisition was served on Obeagu/Amechi Communities as required under the Land Use Act.
The Assembly picked holes in the documents of acquisition of the said 1097 hectares with respect to the Survey plan, official gazette and some correspondences such as:
(i) The survey plan dated 1985 and it read “survey plan for the permanent site of Enugu State University of Science and Technology, which is obviously dubious because Enugu State had not be created in 1985.The State was created in 1991 and Enugu State University of Science and Technology established thereafter.
(i) That Surveyor Igboanugo the acting Surveyor General of Anambra State in 1983 who eventually retired voluntarily in 1984 was said to have signed the survey plan in 1986 which is untrue because he could not have signed the
survey plan as Surveyor General of Anambra State two years after he had left office.
(iii) That the aforementioned official gazette was purported to have been signed in 1986 on behalf of Navy Captain Alison Madueke as the Military Governor of Anambra State when in fact Navy Captain Allison Madueke was not the Military Governor of Anambra Sate at that time.
(iv) The said correspondences supposedly signed by Chief Gabriel Ezeoha Ogbodo on behalf of Obeagu Community in his capacity as the Igwe of Obeagu were forged because he
was not the Igwe of Obeagu in 1986. He was deposed as Igwe of Obeagu long before 1986.
(v) The correspondences purportedly signed by Chief V.V. Chukwuegbo on behalf of Amechi community were also forged. Chief V.V. Chukwuegbo was not the Igwe of Amechi at that time, neither was he the regent. HRH Moses Ogbodo was Igwe of Amechi then.
(vi) That the former Governor of Anambra State, Dr. Jim Nwobodo in Vanguard Newspaper publication of 4th March, 2020, stated that any acquisition or certificate of occupancy over the land made and or predicated on the Anambra State of Nigeria official gazette No.12 Volume II of 27th March, 1986 and the purported 1985 Enugu State University of Science and Technology (plan EN(A)594)when Enugu State was not in
existence is invalid.
That Obeagu/Amechi Communities proved beyond reasonable doubt that they were not carried along in the acquisition process.
That this matter cannot be peaceably resolved by litigation rather through mediation addressing those issues highlighted by the host Communities for a lasting peace both to the investors (including all other developers and persons affiliated to or who derive titles from the host communities)and the host Communities as well.
The Committee accused PEIWA of deliberately withholding information as it concerned fulfilling their financial obligations as stipulated in the New Township Development Agreement, hence, their blatant refusal to submit to the Committee the evidence of payment to the State Government.
That Amechi and Obeagu Communities have not been compensated for the purported acquisition of their ancestral land.
That about 80% of the land is currently encumbered as the communities have sold to several developers who have in turn sold to third parties who are bonafide purchasers without any notice.
That this dispute and numerous litigations are negatively impacting on various meaningful ventures intended for the area, the image of the state is also affected as if it harbours an unfriendly business environment, and in all these, none of those involved, including the communities are better-off either.
Recommendations
The Committee urged the State Government, to, as a matter of urgency set up a high powered mediation panel for possible and amicable resolution of the matter.
That all parties should embrace dialogue and compromise as the only veritable means to peaceably resolve the issue for a lasting peace.
That a mechanism should be put in place to expedite action on the immediate payment of commensurate compensation to the Obeagu and Amechi Communities in respect of the portion of land already developed by PEIWA.
That Enugu State Government should urgently consider entering into partnership with the host communities instead, since the agreement entered with PEIWA touching or involving the entire hectares of land(1,097 hectares), belonging to the host communities without evidence of government acquisition, has created unimaginable complexities and the present hydra headed situation.
That Enugu State Government should call for Audit of all the Lands developed by PEIWA in order to ascertain the exact portion of land under PEIWA’s occupation and its indebtedness to the State Government.
Yes, A Daniel Has Come to Judgement and the masses must be celebrating that they have such a legislature that can be relied upon in cases such as this.
Observers have also stressed the need for the Assembly to followup on the recommendations to see to it’s logical implementation as some very powerful individuals may want to obstruct the course of justice.
This is a test case, and the integrity and resolve of the Enugu House of Assembly is on trial.
By Chinedu Sabastine
ENUGU — No fewer than four communities in Aninri Local Government Area of Enugu State — Mpu, Okpanku, Ndiabor and Oduma — have been ravaged by severe flooding, displacing residents and destroying houses, shops, rice mills, farmlands and other property worth millions of naira.
The flooding, which began on September 20, worsened on Tuesday and Wednesday, submerging parts of Afor Okpanku, Ivo Bridge and adjoining roads.
More than 10 houses reportedly collapsed on Wednesday, while rice, yam and cassava farms were washed away by the rising waters.
As of press time, residents were evacuating their families and belongings to safer locations as heavy rainfall continued in the area.
Screenshot
The councillor representing Mpu Ward, Hon. Edwin Ogbuka, described the situation as life-threatening, saying several houses and farmlands had been affected.
Ogbuka called for urgent government intervention and attributed the flooding to the overflow of water from the abandoned Ivo Dam project.
A community leader in Mpu, Mr Chukwu Magnus Dele, said six villages in the community had been affected, with displaced residents taking refuge at Amachalla Town School.
He appealed to the government and relevant emergency agencies to urgently provide relief materials and other assistance to the victims.
Similarly, the Youth Leader of Okpanku, Mr George Ahaefuna, described the disaster as unprecedented.
“Since I was born, I have never seen this kind of flood in my life. The flood has destroyed all we have laboured for this year.
“It has destroyed our crops, rice and yam farms worth millions of naira. I am appealing to the Federal Government, Enugu State Government, Aninri Local Government, NEMA and SEMA to come to our aid,” he said.
A shop owner at Afor Okpanku Market, Mrs Patricia Chukwu, said goods worth millions of naira had remained submerged for two days.
“This development is devastating. This is the worst flood that has affected Okpanku in my generation.
“If you go inside the villages, you will see houses destroyed by the flood. I urge the government, spirited individuals, the Senator representing Enugu West, the House of Representatives member, the local government chairman and the House of Assembly member to assist those whose houses were destroyed so they can rebuild and return home,” she said.
The flooding was still worsening as of press time, with rain continuing to fall and more buildings and farmlands coming under water.
Residents said Okpanku had experienced major flooding on previous occasions, with community accounts citing 1939, 1965 and 2026 as major flood years.
Speaking on the incident, the Chairman of Aninri Local Government Area, Prince Ugochukwu Nwanjoku, expressed concern over the disaster, saying flooding occurs twice yearly in some parts of the area due to the uncompleted Ivo Dam project.
He said stakeholders were planning a joint visit to the Ivo Dam to assess the reservoir and explore possible repairs to prevent further flooding.
“I felt sad the moment I heard about the incident. Most communities in Aninri have been submerged by flooding, such as Okpanku, Mpu, Uhuezeoke in Ndiabor and parts of Ezineshi in Oduma.
“Crops, houses and businesses were destroyed. We are assessing the situation to know the level of damage this has caused,” he said.
Efforts to reach the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and Enugu State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) for their reactions were unsuccessful as of press time.
The South East Development Commission (SEDC) yesterday commenced the implementation of its South East Agro-Development Programme with the flag-off of a 200-hectare integrated model farm at Nomeh Unateze, Nkanu East, Enugu State.
Designed as a regional development intervention rather than simply a farming project, the initiative will integrate dairy, poultry, fisheries, fodder production, mechanisation, processing and practical agricultural training, while connecting surrounding smallholder farmers to inputs, technical support and markets through an out-grower programme.
The project reflects SEDC’s broader mandate to strengthen productive capacity and create sustainable economic opportunities across the South East, while aligning with the Federal Government’s Renewed Hope Agenda on food security, agricultural productivity, mechanisation, value addition and job creation. The Nomeh facility will serve as a pilot for developing and replicating similar agricultural interventions across the five states of the region, with the broader objective of increasing food production, strengthening agricultural value chains and enabling more people to participate in modern agriculture.
This is a summary of what happened yesterday. They can rewrite it to gain traction according to their audience
IBADAN — Oyo State Governor and Allied Peoples Movement (APM) presidential candidate, Seyi Makinde, has denied claims by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, that the Federal Government provided ₦50 billion to the state for the upgrade of the Ladoke Akintola International Airport, Ibadan.
Makinde made the denial on Tuesday while addressing supporters and stakeholders at the Makinde/Daura 2027 Presidential Town Hall meeting in Katsina.
The governor said the Federal Government did not give either him or the Oyo State Government ₦50 billion for the airport project, insisting that the ongoing expansion and rehabilitation works were being financed entirely by the state.
“My attention was drawn to an interview granted yesterday by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, where he said that the President gave N50 billion to Oyo State to upgrade the Ibadan Airport to international standards,” Makinde said.
“I want to say that claim is false. The President did not give me or Oyo State N50 billion to upgrade the Ibadan Airport. The Ibadan Airport upgrade project is being undertaken 100 per cent with the funds of Oyo State.”
Wike had made the ₦50 billion claim during an appearance on TVC’s Journalists’ Hangout programme on Monday, saying the President Bola Tinubu-led Federal Government had supported the Oyo airport project.
The disagreement centres on the source and nature of funding for the airport’s ongoing upgrade.
Public records from Oyo State indicate that the state had previously identified the Ibadan Airport expansion as one of the projects to be financed through its infrastructure funding plans. The state government has also said that its airport proposal received presidential approval without financial obligations being placed on the Federal Government.
However, the competing claims by Wike and Makinde have not, so far, been accompanied by publicly released financial documents conclusively establishing whether a ₦50 billion Federal Government allocation or transfer was made specifically for the airport project.
The dispute comes against the backdrop of Nigeria’s emerging political alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections, with Makinde seeking the presidency on the APM platform while Wike remains a serving Federal Government minister.
Further clarification from the Federal Government, Oyo State Government, or relevant financial and aviation authorities could help establish the precise source and amount of funding committed to the Ibadan airport project.
Two days after reports circulated online that the Umuahia Premier Club, Umuahia Branch had endorsed the member representing Ikwuano/Umuahia North/Umuahia South Federal Constituency, Hon. Obi Aguocha for a second term, the Club has debunked the report, describing the purported endorsement as unauthorised and a departure from its non-partisan traditions.
In a rejoinder issued on Sunday and signed by its Branch Chairman, Premier Ako Obioma, and Branch Secretary, Premier Chuka Agomoh, the club said its attention had been drawn to a purported endorsement of a candidate contesting for elective political office on the platform of a particular political party.
The leadership said the club is, by its founding philosophy, a socio-cultural, non-partisan and unifying organisation established to foster fraternity, mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, cultural solidarity, and the collective advancement of its members and communities.
“It is therefore not the character, tradition or mandate of the Club to adopt or endorse partisan political candidates,” the statement read.
The club said the purported endorsement constituted a significant departure from its established traditions and ethos, warning that it could generate avoidable disaffection, suspicion, and division among members who are entitled to hold divergent political preferences.
“It is acknowledged that the candidate purportedly endorsed is a member of the Club and is entitled, like every other citizen, to participate in the political process and pursue his legitimate political aspirations. However, membership of the Club cannot, in itself, constitute a basis for transforming the Club into a political platform or committing the collective identity of the Club to the political ambition of any individual member,” the statement said.
The club clarified that the gathering held on Sunday, September 20, 2026, was convened as its monthly general meeting and not as a political meeting or a forum authorised to deliberate upon and endorse a political candidate.
It noted that the Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer, Financial Secretary, Legal Adviser, and four National officers from the branch were reportedly absent from the meeting, adding that the circumstances under which the purported endorsement was made required careful scrutiny.
“It is particularly disturbing that the meeting took place at the residence of the candidate concerned, thereby creating circumstances in which his political associates and party supporters were able to take advantage of the gathering to introduce and advance a partisan agenda that was neither part of the scheduled business of the Club nor sanctioned by its leadership,” the statement read.
The club further said a considerable number of those present were either relatively new members or persons not yet sufficiently conversant with its established procedures and conventions.
“In view of the foregoing, the purported endorsement, to the extent that it purports to represent the collective position of the Club or its Branch, is hereby expressly repudiated, condemned and declared unacceptable,” the statement said.
It warned that appropriate disciplinary measures would be taken against any member found to have deliberately misrepresented the position of the club, acted without authority, or brought its name into disrepute.
The club also reiterated that only the Chairman, Secretary, and Public Relations Officer are authorised to issue or circulate official publications on behalf of the club or the branch, adding that the Secretary and PRO must obtain the requisite approval of the Branch Chairman before issuing any official publication.
“Therefore, anyone who circulated or posted the purported endorsement should as a matter of urgency pull it down immediately,” the statement directed.
The club declared all publications, statements, endorsements or communications already circulated in connection with the purported endorsement as null, void, and of no effect, advising members and the general public to disregard them.
It called on members to remain calm, exercise restraint, and refrain from any action or publication capable of exacerbating the situation, stressing that the club’s unity, integrity, and continued cohesion remain paramount.
“Our political affiliations may differ; our cultural heritage unites us. Our individual political ambitions may vary; the collective interest of our Club and our clans must remain sacrosanct,” the statement concluded.
Enugu Air has launched a new official website, moving its online services to www.enuguairlines.ng.
The airline announced the development in a statement informing passengers and customers of the change, describing the new platform as a safer and more convenient digital channel for accessing its services.
Announcing the migration, Enugu Air said: “We’ve moved! We’re innovating! We’ve migrated to a better, safer and convenient website to connect you to the world.”
According to the airline, the new website will serve as its digital platform for flight bookings, schedules and operational updates.
Passengers and prospective travellers can now visit www.enuguairlines.ng to book flights, check schedules and access the latest information about the airline’s operations.
Enugu Air urged customers to save the new web address and use it for all online flight-related services.
The airline stressed that the change would not affect its identity or services, stating: “Same Enugu Air. New web address.”
It also warned passengers that its former website, enuguairlines.com, had been discontinued and was no longer in use.
The airline therefore advised customers to use www.enuguairlines.ng for its current online services and flight-related information.
-
News2 days agoFirst Niger Bridge Maintenance Extended by One Week Over Heavy Rain
-
News4 days agoNwifuru Sacks Ebonyi Works Commissioner
-
Politics2 days agoHow Tinubu Settled The G-5 Governors, I didn’t benefit alone – Wike
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Mbah Appoints 101 New Aides in Enugu (List)
-
Politics2 days agoI will never support Hope Uzodimma to be Senate Preaident – Wike
-
Education2 days agoPrincipal Queried, Alfa Arrested Over Alleged Blood Tests for Admission
-
News2 days agoNigeria Moves to Boost Airpower, Seals Deal for 12 US Attack Helicopters
-
News2 days agoLandslide: Enugu Assembly Urges Urgent Intervention in Ugwueme, Nenwenta