News
Controversial Enugu Centenary Land: A Daniel Has Come To Judgement
The Enugu House of Assembly may not have made headlines for sometime, not because the House has not been sitting or performing it’s constitutional functions but the Media may not have seen weighty decisions to guarantee top spots in the news.
However, the recent report on the controversial Centenary City Land which has claimed some lives was a major decision that has attracted the attention of major media houses across the country.
For a controversy that led to several litigations, muscle flexing, behind the scene manoeuvres involving very prominent and powerful individuals, one could have predicted that even the Obeagu and Amaechi Communities must have had doubts if the Assembly would be able to treat their matter without fear or favour.
But the Assembly came out smoking; delivering a shocking report that can only be described as transparent.
The report of the Special Committee on
Land Matters/Dispute has continued to receive wide commendations across the country.
And the media cannot help but document this landmark report at a time the common man was losing fate in the system.
The Issues At Stake
The petition from Obeagu and Amechi Communities alleged that a private firm, Private Estates International West Africa(PEIWA) used intimidation, harassment, malicious demolition of buildings in order to forcefully takeover their ancestral land despite pending suits in court.
It all started sometime in 1982, when former Governor of Old Anambra State Dr. Jim Nwobodo, a native of Amechi Awkunanaw proposed to site a university within his home community.
He commissioned for Survey works pursuant to the proposed acquisition of an estimated 318.560 hectares of land in certain kindred families in Amechi Uwani and the Obeagu Awkunanaw Community.
Preliminary Survey was done and endorsed by the then Surveyor General, M.U.C Obi dated March 8, 1982 with Tracing No: MISC AN-53 for 318.560 hectares.
However, Jim Nwobodo left office in 1983 and was unable to complete the acquisition and the project.
But a certain Private company, Private Estates International West Africa Limited (PEIWA), entered the land sometime in 2009 in the name of a New Township Development Joint venture with the Government and began to clear the land for the proposed development.
The promoters of the new project allegedly extended the land from 318.560 to over 1097 hectares of their ancestral lands partly belonging to AmechiUwani and the other part to Obeagu Awkunanaw.
While the survey sketch for the proposed Anambra State University of Technology was registered as TRACING NO: MISC AN-53, signed by the then Surveyor General, M.U.C Obi and dated March 8, 1982, a new Survey Plan was purportedly re-scripted to bear PLAN No: EN (A) 594 in favour of the Enugu State University of Technology in 1985 and expanded to 1097 hectares.
PEIWA’s Submissions
Responding to issues raised by the communities, PEIWA said they did not participate in the acquisition of the 1,097.128 hectares of land in 1986.
That on 18/5/2009, they entered into agreement with Enugu State Government named” New Township Development Agreement” (NTDA) to develop a model city on the 1,097.128 hectares in Amechi/Obeagu Communities covered by C of O dated 1/1/2009.
That sequel to the above mentioned agreement, the State Government relinquished to PEIWA the said 1,097.128 hectares of land.
That they took full possession of the land in accordance with the provisions as stipulated in New Township Development Agreement.
Committee Findings
In its findings the Assembly Committee noted that PEIWA was unable to prove that the process of acquisition was served on Obeagu/Amechi Communities as required under the Land Use Act.
The Assembly picked holes in the documents of acquisition of the said 1097 hectares with respect to the Survey plan, official gazette and some correspondences such as:
(i) The survey plan dated 1985 and it read “survey plan for the permanent site of Enugu State University of Science and Technology, which is obviously dubious because Enugu State had not be created in 1985.The State was created in 1991 and Enugu State University of Science and Technology established thereafter.
(i) That Surveyor Igboanugo the acting Surveyor General of Anambra State in 1983 who eventually retired voluntarily in 1984 was said to have signed the survey plan in 1986 which is untrue because he could not have signed the
survey plan as Surveyor General of Anambra State two years after he had left office.
(iii) That the aforementioned official gazette was purported to have been signed in 1986 on behalf of Navy Captain Alison Madueke as the Military Governor of Anambra State when in fact Navy Captain Allison Madueke was not the Military Governor of Anambra Sate at that time.
(iv) The said correspondences supposedly signed by Chief Gabriel Ezeoha Ogbodo on behalf of Obeagu Community in his capacity as the Igwe of Obeagu were forged because he
was not the Igwe of Obeagu in 1986. He was deposed as Igwe of Obeagu long before 1986.
(v) The correspondences purportedly signed by Chief V.V. Chukwuegbo on behalf of Amechi community were also forged. Chief V.V. Chukwuegbo was not the Igwe of Amechi at that time, neither was he the regent. HRH Moses Ogbodo was Igwe of Amechi then.
(vi) That the former Governor of Anambra State, Dr. Jim Nwobodo in Vanguard Newspaper publication of 4th March, 2020, stated that any acquisition or certificate of occupancy over the land made and or predicated on the Anambra State of Nigeria official gazette No.12 Volume II of 27th March, 1986 and the purported 1985 Enugu State University of Science and Technology (plan EN(A)594)when Enugu State was not in
existence is invalid.
That Obeagu/Amechi Communities proved beyond reasonable doubt that they were not carried along in the acquisition process.
That this matter cannot be peaceably resolved by litigation rather through mediation addressing those issues highlighted by the host Communities for a lasting peace both to the investors (including all other developers and persons affiliated to or who derive titles from the host communities)and the host Communities as well.
The Committee accused PEIWA of deliberately withholding information as it concerned fulfilling their financial obligations as stipulated in the New Township Development Agreement, hence, their blatant refusal to submit to the Committee the evidence of payment to the State Government.
That Amechi and Obeagu Communities have not been compensated for the purported acquisition of their ancestral land.
That about 80% of the land is currently encumbered as the communities have sold to several developers who have in turn sold to third parties who are bonafide purchasers without any notice.
That this dispute and numerous litigations are negatively impacting on various meaningful ventures intended for the area, the image of the state is also affected as if it harbours an unfriendly business environment, and in all these, none of those involved, including the communities are better-off either.
Recommendations
The Committee urged the State Government, to, as a matter of urgency set up a high powered mediation panel for possible and amicable resolution of the matter.
That all parties should embrace dialogue and compromise as the only veritable means to peaceably resolve the issue for a lasting peace.
That a mechanism should be put in place to expedite action on the immediate payment of commensurate compensation to the Obeagu and Amechi Communities in respect of the portion of land already developed by PEIWA.
That Enugu State Government should urgently consider entering into partnership with the host communities instead, since the agreement entered with PEIWA touching or involving the entire hectares of land(1,097 hectares), belonging to the host communities without evidence of government acquisition, has created unimaginable complexities and the present hydra headed situation.
That Enugu State Government should call for Audit of all the Lands developed by PEIWA in order to ascertain the exact portion of land under PEIWA’s occupation and its indebtedness to the State Government.
Yes, A Daniel Has Come to Judgement and the masses must be celebrating that they have such a legislature that can be relied upon in cases such as this.
Observers have also stressed the need for the Assembly to followup on the recommendations to see to it’s logical implementation as some very powerful individuals may want to obstruct the course of justice.
This is a test case, and the integrity and resolve of the Enugu House of Assembly is on trial.
Tinubu spoke while addressing State House Correspondents after the Renewed Hope Initiative’s second-quarter meeting with wives of state governors, held at the State House, Abuja, on Wednesday.
She stated this while highlighting the efforts of the Renewed Hope Initiative to support vulnerable Nigerians through grants and other interventions.
According to her, beneficiaries of the initiative were given grants, not loans, to enable them to start businesses.
“We’re trying to give hope, and to start Akara business doesn’t take a lot of money. To start roasting corn, or somebody even said kuli kuli doesn’t take much. We didn’t give them a loan; we gave it to them as a grant.
“So we’ve encouraged Nigerians as best as we could. What is within our hands, I have given, and I keep giving,” she said.
The First Lady said the initiative had also supported interventions in healthcare, agriculture, education and social investment.
She said she donated N2bn to tackle tuberculosis, N1bn for breast cancer interventions and N500m to address malnutrition.
“I remember giving for TB. When I heard there were so many TB cases, I gave N2 billion. To breast cancer, I gave a billion. For food malnutrition, I gave half a billion.
“So those are the things we’ve been doing and making sure we can make sure that whatever this government is trying to do, it will see the light of day,” she stated.
Tinubu added that the initiative had also provided scholarships, ICT training and support for agriculture and social investment programmes.
She urged Nigerians not to lose hope despite the country’s economic challenges.
“The narrative has really changed, has changed to challenge the average man, whereas the average man is supposed to have hope. So I like the idea that Mr President say this is the Renewed Hope Agenda.
The remarks, however, triggered swift backlash on social media, with many Nigerians accusing the First Lady of trivialising the economic hardship facing ordinary citizens.
A user on X, @ADCVanguard_, said the video showed “exactly how disconnected Nigeria’s ruling class has become from the reality of ordinary citizens.”
Another user, @ireteeh, contrasted the initiative with private-sector efforts, saying, “The First Lady is empowering people with akara, corn, and kuli-kuli, while an ordinary citizen with limited resources is equipping people to build thriving careers in cybersecurity.”
A user identified as Nefertiti (@firstladyship) said, “Nigerians are in big trouble. There is fire on the mountain but the people are tired of running.”
See also Fire guts Anambra timber market
However, some social media users, especially on X, defended the First Lady, insisting there was nothing wrong with encouraging Nigerians towards such businesses.
A user, @Akikanju1568901, said akara is “one of the most lucrative businesses in Nigeria,” with a low startup cost and high profit margin, adding that “akara sellers sent many kids… to universities, built houses, bought cars.”
Another user, @PemiOladapo, said, “There’s dignity in labour… these are our local snacks! People should start it and scale it!”
A user, @TossynBankz_, however, argued that the criticism was not about the businesses themselves but about timing.
“Nobody is mocking akara, roasted corn, or kuli-kuli. Those are honest businesses. The problem is that Nigerians are asking for a better economy, more jobs, and lower prices. Telling people to start selling akara in this situation just feels like the government doesn’t understand what people are going through,” the user wrote.
By Okey Maduforo, Awka
Scores of buildings obstructing natural waterways in Onitsha and Ogidi are facing demolition as the Anambra State Government steps up efforts to permanently tackle flooding and erosion in the affected communities.
The affected areas are located in Onitsha North, Onitsha South and Idemili North Local Government Areas, where authorities say illegal developments have worsened recurring flood disasters.
The state government also warned land grabbers and property speculators to desist from activities that contribute to environmental degradation and undermine approved urban development plans.
The warning came during a joint inspection of flood- and erosion-prone communities in Ogidi and Onitsha by the Commissioners for Works and Infrastructure, Physical Planning and Urban Development, and Environment.
The inspection team visited several vulnerable locations, including Ogidi Market, Building Materials Market, Opi Stream, the Marine Area and Trans-Nkisi Layout, to assess the extent of damage and identify areas requiring urgent intervention.
Speaking during the inspection, the Commissioner for Works and Infrastructure, Arc. Okey Ezeobi, said Phases Two and Three of the Ogidi Flood Control Project had been completed, while the design for Phase One was ready. He assured residents that the government was committed to providing a lasting solution to the perennial flooding in the area.
Ezeobi blamed much of the erosion damage on land grabbing, unregulated developments and alterations to approved master plans. He urged property owners to preserve designated drainage corridors and support ongoing government remediation efforts.
Also speaking, the Commissioner for Physical Planning and Urban Development, Barr. Chijioke Ojukwu, disclosed that investigations revealed that some traders at the Building Materials Market in Ogidi had erected plazas and shops on designated drainage channels, obstructing the natural flow of stormwater and worsening flooding.
He warned that all structures encroaching on waterways would be removed to enable the government reclaim and restore critical drainage networks in line with Governor Chukwuma Soludo’s vision of building clean, orderly and sustainable communities.
Ojukwu also expressed concern over the growing threat of gully erosion in Trans-Nkisi GRA, Onitsha, describing environmental degradation as a major challenge requiring urgent intervention and strict compliance with planning regulations.
The Commissioner for Environment, Barr. Clem Aguiyi, identified illegal construction, indiscriminate waste disposal and the destruction of vegetation that naturally controls erosion as major factors worsening flooding and erosion across the state.
He called on residents to take collective responsibility by planting erosion-control trees, protecting drainage infrastructure and supporting government initiatives aimed at achieving sustainable environmental management.
The International Human Right Protection Service (IHRPS), Anambra State Chapter, has raised concern over the plight of Nigerians allegedly stranded in South Africa amid renewed xenophobic attacks, urging the Federal Government to urgently evacuate affected citizens and provide each returnee with a N5 million resettlement package.
The group claimed that since the first evacuation flight, no further arrangements have been made to bring more Nigerians home, leaving many stranded despite continued attacks and growing fears for their safety.
It also appealed to President Bola Tinubu and the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Ojukwu, to intensify efforts to protect Nigerian citizens in South Africa and facilitate their safe return.
The organisation, in a statement signed by its Anambra State Chairman, Hon. Dr. Amb. Prince Ekwunife, and Director of Special Duties, Mr. Ikenna-Daniel Okonkwo, said many Nigerians had lost their livelihoods, sold their properties, and were living in fear following recurring xenophobic attacks. It urged the Federal Government to provide a N5 million starter package for each returnee to help them rebuild their lives.
Recent criticisms of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) over the oil spill in Bille Kingdom have generated considerable public debate. While concerns about environmental degradation and the welfare of affected communities are valid and deserve attention, it is important that public discourse on the matter is guided by facts, a clear understanding of institutional responsibilities, and the realities of environmental remediation in the Niger Delta.
Bille Kingdom, like many communities in the Niger Delta, has faced the devastating consequences of oil spills over the years. These incidents have impacted livelihoods, fishing activities, farmlands, and the overall ecosystem upon which residents depend. Understandably, community members and stakeholders expect swift interventions from government agencies and development institutions.
However, attributing sole responsibility for responding to oil spills to the NDDC overlooks the specific mandates assigned to various agencies within Nigeria’s environmental and petroleum sectors.
The NDDC was established primarily as an interventionist agency tasked with facilitating sustainable development in the Niger Delta through infrastructure projects, social programmes, economic empowerment initiatives, and regional development planning. While environmental sustainability forms part of its developmental agenda, the direct containment, investigation, and cleanup of oil spills are responsibilities that largely fall under regulatory agencies and oil operators, in accordance with existing laws and environmental regulations.
This distinction is crucial. Oil spill response typically involves technical assessments, environmental impact studies, joint investigation visits, remediation procedures, and regulatory approvals. These processes are often coordinated by specialised environmental agencies in collaboration with oil companies operating in the affected areas. The NDDC’s involvement is generally complementary, focusing on long-term development interventions, community support programmes, and, where applicable, environmental restoration initiatives.
Furthermore, it is important to recognise that the NDDC has invested significant resources over the years in projects aimed at improving the quality of life in the Niger Delta communities. Across the region, the Commission has undertaken road construction, educational support programmes, healthcare initiatives, skills acquisition schemes, and various environmental projects designed to address the developmental deficits that have historically plagued oil-producing communities.
Critics are right to demand accountability and effective action whenever environmental disasters occur. Public institutions must remain responsive to citizens’ concerns, and affected communities deserve transparency in efforts to address ecological damage. Nevertheless, constructive criticism should be based on an accurate understanding of each institution’s statutory role.
Holding the NDDC responsible for functions outside its primary mandate risks diverting attention from those entities legally obligated to prevent, manage, and remediate oil spills.
Rather than assigning blame without a full appreciation of institutional responsibilities, stakeholders should encourage greater collaboration among oil companies, environmental regulators, state and federal authorities, community leaders, and development agencies, including the NDDC. Such collaboration offers the most practical pathway toward lasting environmental restoration and sustainable development in Bille Kingdom and the wider Niger Delta.
The people of Bille Kingdom deserve solutions, not confusion over mandates. As discussions continue, it is essential that all parties focus on facts, accountability, and coordinated action that delivers meaningful relief and long-term environmental recovery for affected communities.
Martins Ogolo
Public Affairs Analyst
martins.ogolo@yahoo.com
In several communities across the Niger Delta region, the visible government presence around them are projects executed by the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC.
It is, therefore, preposterous for anyone to suggest that the NDDC is not living up to its billing as an intervention agency.
A recent video by social critic Hilda Dokubo about water issues in some communities in the region is a clear case of misplaced aggression.
While access to clean drinking water remains an undeniable right for every citizen of the Niger Delta, it is wrong for Dokubo to heap her grievances only at the doorsteps of the NDDC. It is curious that she found it convenient to ignore the statutory tiers of governance responsible for primary public utilities.
When social advocates close their eyes to the fundamental constitutional obligations of state and local governments and heap unearned blame on interventionist agencies, they do more than obscure governance; they mislead a hurting public.
Let us be entirely clear about the statutory tiers of service delivery that Hilda Dokubo chose to ignore for some malicious intent. Under the constitutional architecture of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the provision of basic, everyday domestic infrastructure, specifically water supply, primary health care, and local feeder roads, is the direct, non-negotiable prerogative of State Water Boards and LGA Councils.
State and local governments across this region receive monthly statutory allocations directly from the Federation Account to fund these grassroots necessities. To demand, as Dokubo cheaply implies, that a regional interventionist body assume the permanent administrative role of a community water authority is to completely absolve elected governors and local council chairmen of the very duties they were elected to perform.
In Dokubo’s video clip, she showed the polluted water from one of our communities. It was one of the distasteful consequences of the environmental despoliation in many Niger Delta communities. But rather than calling out the oil companies responsible for the pollution, she focused her gaze solely on the NDDC. The oil companies, like the state and local governments, have a duty to provide basic amenities for their host communities.
Across the Niger Delta, numerous communities have consistently maintained access to clean water through solar-powered water projects implemented by the NDDC.
Dokubo’s selective attack on NDDC does absolutely nothing to keep the water flowing; instead, she is giving a free pass to the silence and negligence of state and local authorities who are failing in their statutory responsibilities.
Hilda Dokubo and her audience must know that the NDDC was established as a specialised, regional interventionist agency, not as a replacement for state and local governments. Its core purpose is to act as a catalyst for macro-development, focusing on regional master planning, constructing major regional trunk lines and interstate roads, executing large-scale environmental remediation, and driving regional human capital development, among others.
Public commentary by social advocates like Hilda Dokubo must move beyond emotional rhetoric to informed, rigorous institutional analysis. Her current approach does not solve the water crisis; it merely shifts the political focus away from local failure and protects the very politicians who are short-changing the grassroots.
The NDDC has undertaken several water projects across the Niger Delta region. Some specific examples include the Emergency Construction of a 10,000-Gallon-Capacity Solar-Powered Water Project in the Soku Community, Akuku-Toru LGA, Rivers State and the solar-powered water project in Abraham Ojo Ama Community, Okobo, Eastern Obolo L.G.A., Akwa Ibom State.
These initiatives are part of NDDC’s broader focus on rural development and clean energy. The commission’s Managing Director, Dr Samuel Ogbuku, has emphasised the importance of solar energy in powering communities and promoting sustainable development. In addition to providing clean water, NDDC’s solar-powered water projects also contribute to the region’s overall development by improving healthcare.
-
News4 days agoPost-Election Cleanup: Enugu Cracks Down on Unauthorized Outdoor Advertising
-
News4 days agoNigerian Customs to Retire Five Deputy Comptrollers-General, 1,516 Officers
-
Crime4 days agoEnugu Student Stabbed to Death by Friend Over Phone Dispute
-
Politics4 days agoEnugu High Court Receives OAU Onyema’s N20m Recovery Suit Against NDC, Dickson, Egwu, Others
-
News4 days agoBREAKING: Abuja Court Sends Sowore To Prison
-
News4 days agoUS opens applications to support Nigerians seeking admission abroad
-
Politics3 days agoSenator dumps APC, alleges injustice, internal crisis in ruling party
-
News5 days agoEnugu North Bye-Election: Nwoye Attributes APC Victory to National Chairman, NWC Members, Gov. Mbah’s support