Connect with us

News

Rights groups demand release of soldier who accused officers of sexual harassment 

Published

on

Two Human Rights groups have demanded the immediate release of female soldier Corporal Ruth Ogunleye who is said to have been detained for accusing army officers of sexual harassment.

This was contained in a joint press statement by Olu Omotayo Esq. For Civil Rights Realisation And Advancement Network (CRRAN) and Okechuwu Nwanguma Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Center (RULAAC).

“We hereby demand the urgent and immediate release of Ogunleye, who was reported in the media to have been arrested by the Military Police and flown to Abuja, where she is currently being wrongfully detained without justification.

“Kindly recall that the Army Spokesman, Brig Gen Onyema Nwachukwu had in ignorance of the correct position of the law, stated that the female soldier had not officially exhausted the available institutionalized channels before going on the social media.
“His statement is ottios, misleading and cannot be backed up by any law, practice or procedure in force in Nigeria.”
They called on the Attorney General of the Federation to rightly guide the Nigerian Army authorities by bringing to their attention the current and correct position of relevant applicable laws as enunciated by the court of Appeal and ensure the immediate release of the detained soldier and thereafter investigate the substance of the complaint which is sexual harassment of the person of Corporal Ruth Ogunleye by the said senior officers.
“This matter cannot be swept under the carpet on technical grounds. The hallmark of democracy is the respect for the Rule of Law by all the organs and components of the Federation and we seek to explore all relevant means within the provisions of the law for the release of Corporal Ruth Ogunleye.

“It is pertinent to bring to your notice the clear and unambiguous provisions of Sections 178 and 179 of the Armed Forces Act 1994. The said provisions guide officers and men of the Armed Forces on the procedure for making complaints respectively.
“We hereby state without equivocation that in view of the interpretation of Sections 178 and 179 of the Armed Forces Act 1994 and the combined decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of NWANKWO V. NIGERIA ARMY & ORS (2021) LPELR-56718(CA) at Pp. 22-26 paras. B-B), Corporal Ruth Ogunleye is entitled to lodge a complaint or seek remedy for whatever wrong she has suffered by other means available within the ambit of the Laws in force in Nigeria.
“The Court of Appeal held that the word ‘MAY’ make a complaint with respect to the matter to the Forces Council, used in the provision is not mandatory after the initial report to his commanding officer. The Court of Appeal held as follows:
“Looking at the wordings of Section 178(1) (reproduced once more for clarity):
“(1) If an officer thinks himself wronged in any matter by a superior officer or authority and on application to his commanding officer does not obtain the redress to which he thinks he is entitled, he ‘MAY’ make a complaint with respect to that matter to the Forces Council.”
“The Appeal Court further held that “there is no duty imposed on any public functionary to do any duty. The use of the verb ‘may’ clearly makes the decision to make a complaint to the Forces Council optional under this subsection”.
“Therefore, the female soldier under the law need not exhaust the channels provided under section 179 of the Armed Forces Act. The initial report to the appropriate authority where she is serving suffices. A careful consideration of the above insight reveals the Army Authorities ignorance of the actual position of the law in view of the pronouncement of the Court of Appeal which is not only disheartening but shameful.
“Furthermore, Corporal Ogunleye, has not committed any offence known to the law to warrant her detention unlawfully. The said detention is in contravention of her Fundamental Human Rights as enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. See Sections 33, 34, 35, 39, 40 and 42 CFRN 1999 As amended.
“Fundamental Human Rights are sacrosanct and must be respected irrespective of the profession of the citizens. There is no exception to the circumstance of Corporal Ogunleye and the fact that she is a member of the Armed Forces does not preclude her from exercising her rights especially where she has been made to suffer a violation and a wrong. We wish to state at this point that where there is a wrong, there must be remedy and she must not be made to suffer any further for seeking remedy and justice. She is thus entitled to urgent and immediate release from the Military police who have held her hostage under the guise of the Armed Forces.”
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Two Infected Terrorists Executed As Cholera Outbreak Kills 9 ISWAP Fighters

Published

on

A cholera outbreak has reportedly killed at least nine fighters of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) in the notorious Timbuktu Triangle, one of the group’s major strongholds in Borno State, according to intelligence sources.

The outbreak is said to have spread across several ISWAP enclaves, exposing worsening sanitary conditions and the dwindling availability of medical care within the insurgents’ camps.

Security analyst Zagazola Makama disclosed the development in a post on X, citing intelligence sources familiar with the situation.

According to the sources, two other ISWAP fighters who contracted the highly infectious disease were allegedly executed by members of the group after efforts to treat them in Kimba village proved unsuccessful.

The incident is believed to reflect the increasingly difficult conditions inside the terrorist camps, where sustained military offensives have disrupted supply routes and severely limited access to medicines, healthcare and other essential resources.

Advertisement

Intelligence sources said the combination of poor hygiene, inadequate medical facilities and mounting operational pressure has left many of the insurgents vulnerable to disease outbreaks.

The sources further disclosed that military commanders have been advised to intensify efforts to intercept medical supplies and pharmaceutical products suspected of being destined for terrorist hideouts. Security officials believe cutting off access to healthcare supplies could further weaken ISWAP’s ability to treat injured or sick fighters and reduce the group’s operational capacity.

While the reports have not been independently verified, the development is seen as another indication of the mounting challenges facing the insurgent group as security forces continue sustained operations across the North-East.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Kidnapped Oyo pupils, teachers regain freedom

Published

on

The pupils and teachers abducted in Orire Local Government Area of Oyo State have regained their freedom.

The development was disclosed on Friday by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

In a shared post on his verified X handle, Onanuga simply announced that the victims had been released by their abductors.

“Finally, all the kidnapped pupils and teachers in Orire, Oyo have been rescued by our security agencies,” he wrote.

As of the time of filing this report, details surrounding their release, including whether any ransom was paid or the circumstances leading to their freedom, had yet to be disclosed.

Advertisement

The abductions occurred on May 15, 2026, when armed men attacked three schools; Community Grammar School, Baptist Nursery and Primary School, and L.A. Primary School, in the Esiele and Yawota communities of Oriire Local Government Area.

No fewer than 39 pupils and seven teachers, including a principal, were taken during the attacks.

During the attack, a teacher, Joel Adesiyan, was killed while attempting to escape.

Another teacher, Michael Oyedokun, was beheaded in the kidnappers’ den.

The terrorists holding the victims had reportedly made a four-point demand before agreeing to free the captives, including the release of detained terrorist commanders, payment of ransom, two Hilux vehicles and the implementation of Sharia-related law.

Advertisement

The Oyo State Government had consistently maintained that no ransom would be paid to secure the release of any victims.

The incident had triggered weeks of public anguish, with the Nigeria Union of Teachers embarking on a month-long strike in the state to press for the victims’ rescue before suspending the action in July.

It also drew federal intervention, with military and police authorities repeatedly assuring Nigerians that operations to secure the victims’ freedom were ongoing.

Continue Reading

News

‘N100,000 Is Not Enough’: Veterans, Serving Personnel Fault Soldiers’ Pay 

Published

on

Reactions have trailed to trail the disclosure by the Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru Abubakar, that Nigerian soldiers now earn a minimum monthly salary of N100,000 following recent welfare reforms by the Federal Government.

Veterans and serving personnel have described the amount as grossly inadequate in the face of Nigeria’s rising cost of living, while some accused the Federal Government of failing to implement a more substantial salary review promised months ago.

The criticism comes amid renewed concerns over troop welfare, military funding, and the effectiveness of efforts to boost morale among personnel battling insecurity across the country.

A retired soldier, Abdul Isiak, argued that the current salary falls far short of what is needed to meet basic living expenses.

“It is not enough at all. What is N100,000 in the current situation of the country? It cannot go far. They should do better. If soldiers are paid more, they will be more motivated and committed to their duties,” he said.

Advertisement

Another retired military officer, Sergeant Zaki Williams, questioned the accuracy of the figure disclosed by the minister and described the amount as inadequate for personnel who risk their lives in service to the nation.

“I doubt if they are even paying up to that amount now. Even if they are, it is too little. Any government paying a soldier N100,000 in today’s economy is not serious enough about the welfare of its troops,” he said.

Williams noted that soldiers face enormous challenges and deserve better remuneration and working conditions.

Also reacting, the Coordinator of the Coalition for Concerned Veterans, Abiodun Herbert-Durowaye, said the salary does not reflect the sacrifices made by military personnel.

“How can that be sufficient for someone putting his life on the line for the country? Consider the cost of food, housing, transportation, and children’s education. N100,000 is far from adequate for those responsible for protecting the nation’s peace and security,” he stated.

Advertisement

The reactions followed comments by the Minister of Defence during an interview with News Central, where he disclosed that the minimum monthly salary of soldiers had increased from N49,000 to N100,000 under the current administration.

According to the minister, the Federal Government has made deliberate efforts to improve troop welfare despite funding challenges facing the military.

“When they started, a soldier was collecting N49,000 monthly. We tried so hard, now he’s collecting N100,000,” he said.

Musa, however, acknowledged that the defence sector remains underfunded and requires greater financial support to effectively address the country’s security challenges.

The minister also advocated stricter penalties for kidnapping, including the possibility of introducing the death penalty for convicted kidnappers, arguing that stronger deterrents are necessary to curb the growing wave of abductions across the country.

Advertisement

The debate over soldiers’ welfare comes at a time when the military continues to confront multiple security threats, with stakeholders insisting that improved remuneration, better equipment, and enhanced welfare packages are critical to boosting morale and operational effectiveness.

Continue Reading

News

Nigerian Visa Applicants Now Required to Submit Applications Directly at Embassy, Consulates

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has announced that travellers in the United States seeking Nigerian visas must now submit their applications directly at Nigerian diplomatic missions following the termination of its contract with a third-party visa processing company.

The new directive, which takes immediate effect, ends the role previously played by Online Integrated Solutions (OIS Services), which had been responsible for receiving and processing Nigerian visa applications through its centres across the United States.

In a statement issued on Thursday, the NIS Public Relations Officer, Akinsola Akinlabi, said visa applicants are now required to submit their documents directly at the Embassy of Nigeria in Washington, D.C., or at the Nigerian Consulates in New York and Atlanta until further notice.

The immigration service did not state the reason for ending its partnership with OIS Services.

However, Akinlabi assured applicants that adequate measures have been put in place at the embassy and consulates to ensure a smooth transition. He added that visa submission, processing and approval would continue without disruption.

Advertisement

He also urged prospective travellers to monitor the official communication channels of the Nigeria Immigration Service and Nigerian diplomatic missions in the United States for updates on visa application procedures.

Continue Reading

News

Don urges S/African Govt. to take active responsibility of protecting foreigners

Published

on

A Professor of Economics and Governance, Prof. Chiwuike Uba, has called on South African Government to take active responsibility of protecting foreigner and desist from ‘compromising inaction’.

Uba, Chairman of the ACUF Initiative for Policy and Governance, made the call on Thursday in Enugu in a statement he titled: “South Africa Is Playing with Fire, and Its Elites Are Holding the Match”.

He said that the lack of intentional action against the individuals and groups perpetrate the xenophobic attacks, who are non-state actors, raises serious questions under international law.

The don noted that “protection of non-nationals is a clear obligation, not a discretionary act.”

According to him, persistent failure to uphold this responsibility undermines both legal commitments and diplomatic credibility.

Advertisement

Uba said that the implications of the development extend far beyond South Africa, adding that it would have economically, politically and diplomatically consequences both to the country and Africa in general.

He noted that economically, the country is not just another market.

“It is a continental anchor. Its financial systems, industrial base, and regional linkages make it central to African growth.

“Prolonged instability would ripple outward, constraining trade, deterring investment, and weakening regional integration,” he said.

On the Political aspect, he said that South Africa had long been seen as a model of democratic transition and constitutionalism.

Advertisement

“If that model begins to fracture, it sends a powerful signal across the continent.

“It emboldens those who argue that institutional democracy cannot deliver, and it weakens reformist voices elsewhere,” he said.

Uba said that diplomatically, xenophobic violence is not a domestic issue when it targets foreign nationals.

He said, “It is an international concern that tests regional solidarity and diplomatic patience.

“Each episode forces other African governments to respond, balancing domestic outrage with the need to preserve bilateral relations.”

Advertisement

The don noted that over time, the balance in the country would becomes harder to maintain as non-state actors would be emboldened to perpetrate other unlawful acts as they view the government as weak or inactive.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending