Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

Politics

Enugu guber: Who is afraid of Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa

Published

on

Maduka University

The race for the Enugu Lion Building has long begun. The consultations, lobbying, horse trading and permutations have continued to play out at the background.

The issue of zoning is all but settled as politcial observers continue to monitor the Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi’s body language.

But, Enugu East Zone, expecting to get the nod at the end of the day, have continued to roll out aspirants in preparation for the showdown.

One man stands out in this crowd of aspirants. He is Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa. The recently retired Federal Permanent Secretary could not refuse the urge, the call, the request by his Nkanu people to present himself for the guber race.

What started like the usual politcial cliche, where politicians arrange for people to beg them to run for an election, soon, like a wild fire became a consciousnees.

His acceptance and credibility was imminent. It soon spread across the state and everybody struggled to identify with ‘Odalije.’

Advertisement

Award ceremonies, special recognitions and various types of social gatherings in honour of Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa became the order of the day.

Today this grassroots propelled guber aspiration has grown into a movement and has thus become a threat to every other ambition in the state.

EverydayNews investigations reveal concerted gang up to discredit and probably pull down this shining star long before the chips are down.

Then came the reception of Sir Ohaa by the Awkunanaw clan. The speech of former Senate President Ken Nnamani became an issue for camping as they unsuccessfully twisted and adjusted to make it an attack weapon.

An unruffled camp merely laughed at the ignorance of a people and refused to join issues.

Advertisement

Senator Ken Nnamani spoke on Saturday, 14/08/21, at Akpasha, Akegbe Ugwu, Nkanu West Local Government Area, Enugu state, venue of the reception organised by the Awkunanaw Welfare Association, the umbrella development Union of 21 autonomous communities of Awkunanaw clan in Nkanu West and Enugu South Local Government Areas of Enugu state.

He narrated how he intervened to stop the harassment of his fellow kinsman, Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa by EFCC, advising the EFCC to dig deeper in its investigation instead of hounding an ordinary civil servant whose offense is mere execution of the directives given by those on whose table the buck stopped. EFCC heeded the advice and let Senator Ken Nnamani’s kinsman off the hook after a thorough investigation, a probe that lasted several months within which Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was unlawfully detained and removed from office as the Accountant General of Enugu State to allow for unfettered investigations.

Upon completion of investigation and after a harrowing 3 months of incarceration, Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was freed by EFCC with no condition attached. He was found to have committed no crime. Between him and EFCC, there was no plea bargain as to warrant him becoming a prosecution witness; he was, therefore, not made a witness to or against any of the other accused persons in the matter as there was no basis for that.

This is what Senator Ken Nnamani, got wrong, probably by a slip of thought when he wrongly claimed that Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was made a witness.

It is noteworthy that immediately Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was freed by EFCC, the government of His Excellency, Dr. Chimaroke Nnamani in 2007 appointed him the Honourable Commissioner for Agriculture, Enugu State.

Advertisement

The minimal Constitutional requirement for such appointment is security clearance from DSS and EFCC, and an appearance before the State House of Assembly for screening, approval and confirmation.

Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa got a clean bill on the security reports from all the security agencies prior to the House of Assembly screening as nothing criminal was pending against him.

The pertinent questions remain, at what point was he then a witness against the government of Dr. Chimaroke Nnamani or anybody else in that government? Was he a witness against the government in a matter pending in the court at the instance of EFCC and Governor Chimaroke Nnamani went ahead to appoint him the Honourable Commissioner for Agriculture in the same government?

The Court records are also there to confirm if there were an any evidence of his court appearances or statement to EFCC portraying him as a prosecution witness? The pendency of the case against those indicted by EFCC in this matter has lasted several years and at no point or adjournment has Sir Chinyeaka ever appeared as a witness. The court records are there.

The thought/allegation, bereft of any shred of evidence, that Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was a witness in the EFCC case against Dr Chimaroke Nnamani or anybody in that government is replete with patent illogicalities, and those bandying about the falsehood that Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa has a case to answer with EFCC should go to the next door.

Advertisement

The granite fact is, Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was not, neither would he have been, nor would he ever be a witness against a government that elevated him to the enviable position of Accountant General of Enugu State.

At the end of the regime of Dr Chimaroke Nnamani in 2007, Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa transfered his service to the federal Civil Service where he rose to become Director of Finance and Accounts in several ministries, including the ministries of Labour, Transport, Water Resources and Defense.

In 2015, the government of President Mohammadu Buhari appointed him to the position of a federal Permanent Secretary, deploying him, first, to Ministry of Sports and Youth Development and, later, to the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation, HOSF.

Again, he was deployed to the Federal Capital Territory Authority, FCTA. He, finally, retired as Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Power on 4th February, 2021.

It is trite that, with the tentacles of President Buhari’s anti graft agencies spread across all the MDAs, thorough background checks through high wire security investigations, resulting in objective security reports/clearance, preceded all the federal appointments made by President Mohammadu Buhari, including the post of Permanent Secretary, which Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa by the grace of God, hard work and dedication, got in the course of his epic sojourn at the federal civil service. To, therefore, state or insinuate that Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa has a case to answer in respect of the EFCC investigations and indictment of some officials of the government of Dr. Chimaroke Nnamani after Sir Chinyeaka Ohaa was freed by the EFCC on the same matter, 15 years ago, is utterly frivolous, vexatious and preposterous.

Advertisement

Sir Ohaa is only paying the price of acceptably and popularity as he marches, one step at a time, to the Enugu Lion Building.

Advertisement
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Nnamani Felix

    August 23, 2021 at 3:13 pm

    Praise Singers, trying to justify their pay.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Ebonyi Guber: ‘Our People Deserve Better Government,’ Odii Insists

Published

on

Maduka University

By Petrus Obi, London

London — The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Ebonyi State, Ifeanyi Odii, has intensified his criticism of the administration of Governor Francis Nwifuru, insisting that the people of the state deserve a different approach to governance.

Odii, who spoke with EverydayNewsngr.net in London, said what he described as the “fire brigade approach” of the Nwifuru administration was not the kind of governance Ebonyi needs.

According to him, the state requires a government with a clear vision, long-term planning and the capacity to deliver meaningful development to its people.

“The fire brigade approach of the Nwifuru government is not what the state needs,” Odii said.

He added: “I am coming to bring a new lease of life to my people.”

Odii’s comments come amid renewed political debate in Ebonyi State following the recent removal of the state Commissioner for Works. The development has attracted attention from opposition circles, with critics using it to question aspects of the administration’s handling of governance and infrastructure.

The PDP chieftain said the people of Ebonyi should expect more than what he described as reactive governance, arguing that development should be driven by a coherent programme capable of producing lasting results.

He maintained that his political ambition was motivated by a desire to provide what he described as purposeful leadership and improve the welfare of residents across the state.

“We deserve better government in Ebonyi State,” Odii said, stressing that his vision was centred on giving the people renewed confidence in government and creating opportunities for them to prosper.

As political activities ahead of the next governorship election continue to gather momentum, governance, infrastructure, accountability and the delivery of public services are expected to feature prominently in the emerging contest.

Odii’s intervention in London is likely to add further momentum to the political conversation, particularly as opposition figures seek to distinguish their vision for Ebonyi from that of the incumbent administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

EBONYI 2027: The People, Not Individuals Will Decide Who Becomes Governor – Igwe

Published

on

Maduka University

STATEMENT BY CHIEF EMMANUEL CHIDI IGWE,

SPOKESPERSON TO CHIEF DR. IFEANYI CHUKWUMA ODII

The 2027 governorship election in Ebonyi State is not a family affair, nor is it a matter to be decided by one individual or political godfather. It is a democratic contest, and Ebonyians will ultimately decide who becomes their governor through the ballot box.
No aspirant should be expected to step down simply because another politician believes he should. Every qualified candidate has the right to contest, present his programme and seek the mandate of the people.
Let me make this clear: since Senator Dave Umahi did not bring Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii into the governorship race, he cannot now claim the authority to ask him to step down. Chief Odii has his own political identity, supporters, convictions and legitimate right to seek the mandate of Ebonyians.
The decision to contest or withdraw belongs to the candidate, while the ultimate decision on who governs Ebonyi State belongs to the people.
The 2027 election should therefore be about issues, programmes, records, accountability and the future of Ebonyi—not political arrangements made by individuals behind closed doors.
Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii is prepared to place his vision and programme before Ebonyians and subject them to public scrutiny. Those seeking to retain power should equally be prepared to defend their records before the electorate.
Ebonyi 2027 is not a family arrangement. It is a contest for the confidence of the people. The people of Ebonyi State—not individuals—will have the final say.
Chief Emmanuel Chidi Igwe
Spokesperson to Chief Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma Odii

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING: SaharaReporters Report on Arrest of Enugu Traditional Ruler, Ex-Lawmaker Is False and Misleading

Published

on

Maduka University

The recent publication by SaharaReporters alleging that prominent Enugu traditional ruler, Igwe Obiora Igwesi, his brother and former federal lawmaker, Hon. Uchenna Sunday A. Igwesi (USA Igwesi), and eight others were arrested over an alleged attack on an NDC ward meeting in Obuoffia, Nkanu West Local Government Area, is false and deeply misleading.

The report is being described as a deliberate attempt to damage the reputation of respected leaders in Enugu State and create unnecessary political tension ahead of the 2027 elections.

Contrary to the claims contained in the publication, there was no arrest ordered by the Inspector-General of Police against Igwe Obiora Igwesi, Hon. USA Igwesi, or the other individuals named in connection with any alleged attack on an NDC meeting. There was also no operation by detectives from Zone 13 Command, Ukpo, Dunukofia, Anambra State, as alleged in the report.

Similarly, the purported petition dated September 15, 2026, and the allegations of conspiracy, unlawful possession of firearms, attempted murder, assault, threatening violence and stealing are strongly disputed and described as fabricated claims intended to create a damaging narrative around the individuals concerned.

The broader allegation that the 17 Local Government Areas of Enugu State have experienced coordinated armed attacks allegedly sponsored by Local Government Chairmen to silence the opposition is equally rejected as unfounded.

Attempts to associate Igwe Obiora Igwesi and Hon. USA Igwesi with criminal activity or political violence are viewed as an unacceptable effort to tarnish the image of individuals who have served their communities and contributed to the development of Enugu State.

The public, particularly the people of Enugu State, is therefore urged to exercise caution and verify the facts independently before accepting or circulating the allegations contained in the SaharaReporters publication.

Enugu State remains focused on peace, stability and development. Political disagreements should not be allowed to degenerate into the circulation of unverified allegations capable of inflaming tensions or damaging the reputations of individuals.

The position being maintained by the affected parties is clear: there was no arrest of the named individuals in connection with the alleged incident, no evidence has been presented establishing that any Local Government Chairman sponsored an attack, and the allegations contained in the publication are disputed in their entirety.

The public is encouraged to await verifiable facts from the appropriate authorities rather than rely on claims that have not been independently substantiated.

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP Enugu Ticket: Did Nnaji’s Running Mate Violate Electoral Act?

Published

on

Maduka University

Fresh legal questions emerge over Chijioke Ugwu’s membership registration after Supreme Court restores party-register provisions
By Our Correspondent

Fresh legal questions have emerged over the Peoples Democratic Party’s 2027 governorship ticket in Enugu State following the Supreme Court’s restoration of key provisions of the Electoral Act dealing with political party membership registers and the conduct of primaries.

The questions centre on Chief Chijioke Peter Ugwu, who was recently announced by the PDP governorship candidate, Chief Uche Geoffrey Nnaji, as his running mate.

Nnaji announced Ugwu’s selection on September 24, shortly after the Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment restoring Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026. Ugwu’s selection was subsequently reported by several Nigerian media outlets.

But documents and information available to this newspaper raise a question that could potentially become significant if the PDP ticket is challenged in court.

The PDP governorship primary in Enugu State was conducted on May 25, 2026.

However, Ugwu is understood to have registered as a PDP member on May 31, 2026 — six days after the governorship primary.

This means that if the May 31 registration date is accurately reflected in the party’s official records, his name could not have appeared in the PDP membership register submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) before the May 25 governorship primary.

That immediately raises the question:

Can a person who was not a member of the party on the date of its governorship primary subsequently be selected as the deputy governorship candidate without the Supreme Court’s restored membership-register provisions affecting the ticket?

What the Supreme Court restored
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous judgment delivered on September 24, set aside the Court of Appeal’s earlier decision which had declared the disputed provisions of the Electoral Act unconstitutional.

The apex court upheld the validity of Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), following an appeal by INEC against the Court of Appeal judgment in the case involving the Zenith Labour Party.

Section 77(5) provides that only persons whose names are contained in a political party’s membership register submitted to INEC at least 21 days before a primary, congress or convention may participate in the exercise.

Section 77(6) requires political parties to use the membership register submitted to INEC for their primaries, congresses and conventions.

Section 77(7) deals with the consequence of failure by a party to submit its membership register within the prescribed period.

These provisions are now back in force following the Supreme Court judgment. Legal opinions suggest that the law’s insistence on the membership register submitted to INEC is relevant to the validity of the party’s eventual nomination process, depending on how the PDP formally nominated and submitted its governorship and deputy governorship candidates.

The precise documents will therefore be crucial.

Among the questions likely to arise are:

What date did the PDP submit its membership register to INEC?
Was Ugwu’s name contained in that register?
When exactly did Ugwu become a registered PDP member?
Was he a PDP member before the register was submitted to INEC?
How did the PDP formally nominate him as running mate?
Was the nomination made through a procedure recognised by the Electoral Act and the party’s constitution?
The controversy is coming at a sensitive time for the PDP, which has only recently unveiled Ugwu as Nnaji’s running mate. Ugwu, from Nguru in Nsukka Local Government Area, is an entrepreneur, philanthropist and community leader who runs businesses in logistics, contracting, consultancy and hospitality.

However, the governorship candidate and the deputy governorship candidate constitute a single electoral ticket. Therefore, any legal or constitutional issue affecting the eligibility of the deputy governorship candidate automatically has implications for the validity of the joint ticket, including the governorship candidate.

Another legal opinion available to this newspaper insists that “the gubernatorial ticket is a joint one. If the name of a deputy governor is not on the digital register, it invalidates the entire process.”

In the 2019 Bayelsa governorship election, APC’s David Lyon was declared winner. His running mate was Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo.

The Supreme Court later disqualified Degi-Eremienyo over the documents he submitted to INEC. The crucial point was that the Supreme Court held that his disqualification affected the joint ticket he shared with David Lyon. Consequently, the court ordered INEC to withdraw the Certificate of Return issued to Lyon and his deputy.

This happened one day before Lyon was due to be sworn in as governor. The certificate was subsequently issued to Douye Diri of the PDP, who had the next-highest lawful votes and the required geographical spread.

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC Announces PVC Collection as Onwuegbu Supporters Mobilise Constituents

Published

on

Maduka University

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced that the collection of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) will commence nationwide on October 9.

The development has prompted calls for eligible voters to visit the INEC office in their respective Local Government Areas to collect their PVCs and ensure they are prepared to participate in the electoral process.

Meanwhile, supporters of Hon. Engr. Anayo Onwuegbu, Omeiheukwu Akpugoeze, have urged constituents in the Aninri/Awgu/Oji River Federal Constituency to support his bid for a second term in the Federal House of Representatives.

The supporters made the appeal while encouraging eligible residents to collect their PVCs and exercise their franchise in the forthcoming election.

Voters are advised to follow official INEC guidelines and verify the applicable collection procedures and dates before visiting their designated collection centres.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending