Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

News

Allocation: States share N907bn, Tinubu approves infrastructure fund

Published

on

Maduka University
The Federation Account Allocation Committee says it shared N907.05bn among the three tiers of government for June 2023.

The figure represents a marginal increase of N120.89bn compared to the N786.16bn shared for May 2023, and it is the highest this year and the second increase following a constant decline since January.

FAAC disclosed this in a communiqué issued at the end of its latest meeting in Abuja on Thursday.

The meeting was chaired by the new Accountant General of the Federation, Dr Oluwatoyin Madein.

The increase recorded for May was, however, higher than that of June despite the fuel subsidy removal.

Advertisement

The total amount includes gross statutory revenue, Value Added Tax, and electronic money transfer levies and exchange rate difference revenue.

The communique read, “The N907.05bn total distributable revenue comprised distributable statutory revenue of N301.50bn, distributable Value Added Tax revenue of N273.23bn, Electronic Money Transfer Levy revenue of N11.44bn and Exchange Difference revenue of N320.89bn.”

The Federal Government received N345.56bn, the states received N295.95bn, and the local government councils got N218.06bn, while the oil-producing states received N47.48bn as derivation (13 per cent of mineral revenue).

It was also disclosed that a gross statutory revenue of N1.15tn was received for the month of June 2023, which was higher than the sum of N701.79bn received in the previous month by N451.13bn.

The communique added, “From the N301.50bn distributable statutory revenue, the Federal Government received N146.71bn, the State Governments received N74.41bn and the Local Government Councils received N57.37bn. The sum of N23.01bn was shared to the relevant States as 13 per cent derivation revenue.

Advertisement
“For the month of June 2023, the gross revenue available from the Value Added Tax was N293.41bn.  This was higher than the N270.2bn available in the month of May 2023 by N23.21bn. The Federal Government received N40.98bn, the State Governments received N136.61bn and the Local Government Councils received N95.63bn from the N273.23bn distributable Value Added Tax revenue.

‘The N11.44Bn Electronic Money Transfer Levy was shared as follows: the Federal Government received N1.72bn, the State Governments received N5.72bn and the Local Government Councils received N4bn.

“From the N320.89bn Exchange Difference revenue, the Federal Government received N156.16bn, the State Governments received N79.20bn, the Local Government Councils received N61.06bn and the sum of N24.47bn was shared to the relevant States as 13 per cent mineral revenue.”

It was further disclosed that in June 2023, the total deductions for cost of collection was N73.24bn and total deductions for savings, transfers and refunds was N979.08bn.

“The balance in the Excess Crude Account was $473,754.57,” it added.

Advertisement

According to the communiqué, in June 2023, Companies Income Tax recorded tremendous increase. Import and Excise Duties, Value Added Tax, Oil and Gas Royalties increased significantly, while Petroleum Profit Tax and Electronic Money Transfer Levy decreased considerably.

In a separate statement from the state house on Thursday, Special Adviser to the President, Special Duties, Communications & Strategy, Dele Alake, it was noted that President Bola Tinubu has approved the establishment of Infrastructure Support Fund for the 36 States of the Federation as part of measures to cushion the effects of the petrol subsidy removal on the people.

The statement added, ”The new Infrastructure Fund will enable the States to intervene and invest in the critical areas of Transportation, including farm to market road improvements; Agriculture, encompassing livestock and ranching solutions; Health, with a focus on basic healthcare; Education, especially basic education; Power and Water Resources, that will improve economic competitiveness, create jobs and deliver economic prosperity for Nigerians.

“The committee also resolved to save a portion of the monthly distributable proceeds to minimize the impact of the increased revenues-occasioned by the subsidy removal and exchange rate unification-on money supply, as well as inflation and the exchange rate.”

The statement also disclosed that about N790bn would be saved to “complement the efforts of the Infrastructure Support Fund (ISF) and other existing and planned fiscal measures, all aimed at ensuring that the subsidy removal translates into tangible improvements in the lives and living standards of Nigerians.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Awka Anglican Diocese Rejects Primate’s Six-Month Suspension of Archbishop Ibezim, Threatens Exit

Published

on

Maduka University

The Diocese of Awka of the Anglican Communion has rejected the directive by the Primate of the Church of Nigeria, Most Revd Henry C. Ndukuba, ordering Archbishop Alexander C. Ibezim to proceed on six months’ compulsory leave, describing the decision as unlawful and unconstitutional.

The diocese also rejected the appointment of the Bishop of Aguata Diocese, Rt. Revd Samuel C. Ezeofor, as supervising bishop of Awka Diocese and coordinating bishop of the Province of the Niger, warning that it would not tolerate any interference in its affairs.

The positions were contained in a communiqué issued after an emergency meeting of the Diocesan Board held on Friday, October 16, 2026, at the Chapel of Divine Favour, Anglican Village, Ifite-Awka, Anambra State.

The communiqué was signed by Sir B.E.I. Nwofor, SAN, Lord Chancellor of the Diocese; Ven. K.E.N. Chukwukamma, PhD, Synod Secretary; and Mr Eugene Chukwudi Okonkwo, Lay Synod Secretary.

The board said it had carefully considered a letter dated October 13, 2026, issued by the Primate, before unanimously rejecting its directives concerning Archbishop Ibezim and the administration of the diocese.

Advertisement

According to the board, the appointment of Ezeofor and the compulsory leave directive were made despite pending court cases involving Ibezim, the Primate and other parties.

It cited three cases before the High Court of Anambra State: Suit No. A/Misc. 446/2025, involving Ibezim and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC); Suit No. A/Misc. 494/2026, involving Ibezim and the Inspector-General of Police and others; and Suit No. A/371/2026, involving Ibezim, Ndukuba and another party.

The board argued that the issues raised in the cases remained before the court and that the parties should refrain from actions capable of interfering with the judicial process.

It further alleged that existing injunctions and pending applications for injunctive relief concerning the matter had not been given due consideration, warning that actions capable of pre-empting the court’s decision could have legal consequences.

The communiqué also questioned the authority of the Primate to direct a fellow bishop and archbishop to proceed on compulsory leave or appoint another bishop to assume his responsibilities.

Advertisement

It maintained that neither the 2020 Constitution and Canons of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) nor the 2023 Constitution and Regulations of the Diocese of Awka empowered the Primate to take such action.

The board specifically disputed the application of Section 29(1) of the church’s constitution, which it said did not confer the powers exercised in the October 13 letter.

It also argued that the directive violated Sections 36(5) and 38(1) of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, as amended, relating to the presumption of innocence and freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

On the stated objective of facilitating an impartial investigation and promoting peace and reconciliation, the board alleged that the Primate had previously constituted two panels to investigate allegations against Ibezim.

It identified the first panel, headed by Justice Babashola Ogunade, as having been constituted in August 2025, while the second, headed by Archbishop Blessing Enyindah, was established in June 2026.

Advertisement

According to the board, both panels had submitted their reports to the Primate, but the findings had not been released.

The board argued that withholding the reports violated provisions of the church’s Constitution and Canons requiring the findings and recommendations of such panels to be submitted to the Episcopal Synod for consideration, with further review and ratification by the appropriate church authorities.

The diocese consequently reaffirmed its confidence in Ibezim, insisting that he remained the Archbishop of the Province of the Niger and Bishop of Awka Diocese and should continue discharging his official responsibilities.

It described the diocese as peaceful, united and progressive, while expressing confidence in Ibezim’s integrity, competence, commitment and leadership.

The board also dismissed allegations of financial impropriety against the archbishop, declaring that no diocesan funds had been missing, stolen, misused or misappropriated by him. It further claimed that the two investigative panels had not indicted him for financial misconduct.

Advertisement

However, these assertions reflect the position of the Diocesan Board, and the allegations and legal issues cited in the communiqué remain subject to the relevant proceedings and any official findings.

Commending Ibezim for what it described as significant infrastructural development across the diocese, the board urged him to remain focused on his duties despite the ongoing controversy.

It also warned Ezeofor against interfering in the affairs of Awka Diocese, urging him to concentrate on his responsibilities as Bishop of Aguata Diocese.

The board said it would not hesitate to seek legal remedies and involve law enforcement agencies if its warning was ignored.

In a further directive, the board instructed all organs of Awka Diocese to remain loyal to Ibezim and continue their lawful activities, while rejecting directives or interference from Ezeofor. It warned that non-compliance could attract appropriate sanctions.

Advertisement

The communiqué concluded with a strong warning to the Primate and Ezeofor, stating that the diocese could withdraw from the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) and continue under the Church of England if what it described as unlawful interference in its affairs persisted.

The latest development signals a deepening dispute within the Anglican Church, with the Awka Diocesan Board insisting that the leadership question and related allegations should be handled in accordance with the church’s governing instruments and the rule of law.

As of the issuance of the communiqué, the board’s position was that Ibezim remained in office and should continue to exercise his episcopal responsibilities.

The positions of the Primate and Ezeofor on the claims and threats contained in the communiqué were not included in the document.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

We Are Fighting Principalities, Spiritual Forces, Not Flesh and Blood – Archbishop Ibezim

Published

on

Maduka University

Awka Diocese Demands Release of Two Investigative Panel Reports, Rejects Coordinating Bishop

By Okey Maduforo, Awka

The Archbishop of Awka Anglican Diocese, Most Rev. Alexander Chibuzo Ibezim, has described the lingering crisis rocking the Diocese as a spiritual battle against principalities and powers rather than a confrontation against flesh and blood.

This comes as the leadership of the Diocese demanded the immediate release of reports submitted by two panels of inquiry constituted by the Primate of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Most Rev. Henry Ndukuba, to investigate allegations surrounding land sales and other matters involving Archbishop Ibezim.

Addressing worshippers shortly after Holy Communion during Sunday’s service at St. Faith’s Cathedral, Awka, Ibezim urged members of the Diocese to remain steadfast in prayer, stressing that the ongoing crisis should not be approached through physical confrontation.

“At this time of trial, at this moment, let us recognise that we are not fighting against flesh and blood. It is spiritual warfare; it is a battle against principalities and powers, rulers of darkness of this world, spiritual wickedness in high places. And so, our battle is not a battle of flesh and blood,” he declared.

Advertisement

He further admonished the congregation against resorting to violence.

“The Bible enjoins us that we should not fight physically. This is not a time to fight with guns or fight with cutlasses, but it is a fight that is spiritual,” he stated.

The Archbishop called on members of the Cathedral to remain united, pray together and sustain their fellowship, describing the Cathedral altar as a point of contact for prayers across the Diocese and the Province of the Niger.

Meanwhile, the leadership of Awka Diocese has questioned the decision of the Primate to place Archbishop Ibezim on compulsory leave despite the reported completion of investigations by two separate panels earlier constituted to examine allegations against him.

In a resolution signed by the Lord Chancellor of the Diocese, Sir B.E.I. Nwafor, SAN; the Synod Secretary, Ven. K.E.N. Chukwukamma, PhD; and Mr. Eugene Chukwudi Okonkwo, the Diocese described the justification for the compulsory leave as unacceptable.

Advertisement

According to the resolution, the Primate’s explanation that the leave was intended to facilitate an impartial inquiry into the affairs of the Diocese and promote peace and reconciliation was a ruse, given that two previous investigative panels had already submitted their findings.

The Diocese recalled that the first panel was constituted through the Primate’s letter dated August 13, 2025, and headed by Honourable Justice Babashola Ogunade, while the second was established through another letter dated June 17, 2026, under the chairmanship of Archbishop Blessing Enyindah.

It alleged that despite the completion of their assignments, the Primate had neither released the reports nor disclosed their findings.

The resolution further accused Ndukuba of violating Sections 75(3), (4) and (5), as well as 76(3), (4) and (5) of the Constitution and Canons of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), 2020.

According to the Diocese, the provisions require the Primate to submit the findings and recommendations of such panels to the Episcopal Synod for consideration.

Advertisement

It maintained that the Episcopal Synod is empowered to review, modify, reject or adopt the recommendations, subject to the approval of the Standing Committee and subsequent ratification by the General Synod, whose decision is final and binding.

Diocese Rejects Coordinating Bishop

In a further escalation of the dispute, the leadership of Awka Diocese rejected any attempt by the newly appointed Coordinating Bishop, Rt. Rev. Samuel Ezeofor, to interfere in its affairs.

“The Board emphatically warns that it will not accept any interference with the affairs of the Diocese of Awka by Rt. Revd. Ezeofor and urges him to concentrate on his work as Bishop of Aguata Diocese and not to be used as an instrument to destabilise or foment trouble in our peaceful Diocese of Awka,” the resolution stated.

It also directed all organs of the Diocese to maintain their loyalty to Archbishop Ibezim and continue their lawful activities.

Advertisement

“The Board directs all organs of the Diocese of Awka to remain loyal to His Grace, The Most Revd. Alexander Chibuzo Ibezim, PhD, and to go ahead with their lawful activities and reject any interference or directive from Rt. Revd. Ezeofor,” it added.

As of the time of filing this report, Bishop Ezeofor, who was appointed by the Primate to oversee the affairs of Awka Diocese, had yet to assume office.

Efforts to obtain reactions from the authorities concerned were unsuccessful.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Former Delta Governor, Emmanuel Uduaghan, Dies at 71

Published

on

Maduka University

Former Governor of Delta State, Dr. Emmanuel Eweta Uduaghan, has passed away at the age of 71 following a brief illness.
Uduaghan reportedly died on Monday morning, October 19, 2026.
His death was confirmed in a statement issued by the Uduaghan family and signed by Toju Andre Uduaghan.
The family expressed profound grief over the loss, describing the former governor as a beloved father, brother, uncle and patriarch whose contributions to public service touched countless lives across Delta State and Nigeria.
“It is with hearts weighed down by immeasurable grief and profound sorrow that we announce the passing to glory of our beloved Father, Brother, Uncle, and Patriarch,” the statement read.
The family described his passing as a devastating loss, noting that he was a source of strength, a respected elder and a father figure whose memories and legacy would remain cherished.
Uduaghan served as Delta State Commissioner for Health between 1999 and 2003 before becoming Secretary to the State Government from 2003 to 2007.
He subsequently emerged as Governor of Delta State, serving two terms from 2007 to 2015.
According to the family, his years in public office were marked by a commitment to human and infrastructural development across the state.
“His passing is a profound loss to our family, the people of Delta State, and Nigeria at large. We are grateful to Almighty God for his life, his service, and the legacy he leaves behind,” the statement added.
The family prayed for the peaceful repose of his soul and divine comfort for relatives, friends, political associates, former colleagues and others mourning his death.
Details of his funeral arrangements were not included in the announcement.

Continue Reading

News

Breakaway Looms in Awka Anglican Diocese Over Archbishop Ibezim’s Compulsory Leave

Published

on

Maduka University

Diocesan Board Rejects Primate’s Directive, Threatens Withdrawal from Church of Nigeria

By Okey Maduforo, Awka
A major crisis is brewing in the Anglican Diocese of Awka following a threat by its Diocesan Board to withdraw from the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) over the six-month compulsory leave imposed on Archbishop Alexander Chibuzo Ibezim by the Primate, Most Rev. Henry Ndukuba.
The development marks a fresh escalation of the face-off between the two senior clerics over allegations surrounding the sale of church land and other administrative matters in the Diocese.
Recall that Primate Ndukuba had, in a letter dated October 13, 2026, directed Archbishop Ibezim to proceed on six months’ compulsory leave to allow for an impartial investigation into the affairs of the Diocese.
The directive prompted Ibezim to institute legal action at the Anambra State High Court, challenging both the Primate’s decision and the constitution of the panel investigating the allegations against him.
However, rising from an emergency meeting, the Awka Diocesan Board rejected the directive in its entirety, warning that continued interference in the affairs of the Diocese could force it to sever ties with the Church of Nigeria.
In a resolution signed by the Lord Chancellor of the Diocese, Sir B.E.I. Nwafor, SAN; the Synod Secretary, Ven. K.E.N. Chukwukamma, PhD; and Mr Eugene Chukwudi Okonkwo, the Board insisted that Archbishop Ibezim remained the legitimate Bishop of Awka and Archbishop of the Province of the Niger.
“The Board emphatically rejects in its entirety the said letter. More specifically, the Board rejects the directive to His Grace, The Most Revd Alexander C. Ibezim, PhD, Archbishop, Province of the Niger and Bishop, Diocese of Awka, to proceed on six months compulsory leave,” the resolution stated.
Board Rejects Appointment of Supervising Bishop
The Board also rejected the appointment of the Bishop of Aguata Diocese, Rt. Rev. Samuel C. Ezeofor, as Supervising Bishop of Awka Diocese and Coordinating Bishop of the Province of the Niger.
It argued that the appointment disregarded pending litigations involving Archbishop Ibezim, including Suit No. A/Misc. 446/2025 against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), filed on September 4, 2025, and Suit No. A/Misc. 494/2026 against the Inspector General of Police and others, filed on October 2, 2026.
It further cited Suit No. A/371/2026, instituted by Archbishop Ibezim against Primate Ndukuba and another party on October 13, 2026.
According to the Board, the cases remain pending before the Anambra State High Court, making it inappropriate for the Church leadership to take actions capable of prejudicing their determination.
It maintained that both the Primate and Bishop Ezeofor were aware of the pending suits and should refrain from interfering with their subject matter.
The Board also referred to subsisting injunctive orders reportedly issued by the High Court on September 9, 2025, and renewed by consent of the parties on October 14, 2025.
It further disclosed that a pending motion in Suit No. A/371/2026 seeks to restrain the Primate from issuing any suspension letter or taking steps capable of truncating Ibezim’s tenure as Archbishop and Bishop of Awka.
“The Primate and Rt. Revd Ezeofor are fully aware that no one is above the law irrespective of his or her position or status, and ought to be law-abiding and respect the court where the allegations against Archbishop Ibezim are pending for determination,” the Board stated.
Primate Lacks Constitutional Powers, Board Insists
The Diocesan Board further contended that neither the Constitution and Canons of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) 2020 nor the Constitution and Regulations of Awka Diocese 2023 empowers the Primate to compel a serving Archbishop to embark on compulsory leave.
It specifically disputed the application of Section 29(1) of the Church’s Constitution, cited in the Primate’s October 13 letter, arguing that the provision does not authorise the removal of a Bishop from active duties or the transfer of his episcopal responsibilities to another Bishop under such circumstances.
The Board described the decision as oppressive, vindictive and unjust, alleging that it violated Archbishop Ibezim’s constitutional rights under Sections 36(5) and 38(1) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended.
It maintained that Ibezim was entitled to the presumption of innocence and freedom of religion, including the right to participate in worship and other religious activities.
Board Questions Previous Investigative Panels
The Board also questioned the justification for another investigation, alleging that the Primate had previously constituted two separate panels to investigate allegations against Archbishop Ibezim.
According to the resolution, the first panel, headed by Justice Babashola Ogunade, was constituted on August 13, 2025, while the second, chaired by Archbishop Blessing Enyindah, was inaugurated through a letter dated June 17, 2026.
It alleged that both panels completed their assignments and submitted reports to the Primate, who had yet to release their findings.
The Board argued that withholding the reports violated Sections 75 and 76 of the Church’s Constitution and Canons, which provide procedures for submitting investigative findings to the Episcopal Synod and other appropriate Church organs for consideration and ratification.
It consequently dismissed the explanation that the compulsory leave was intended to facilitate an impartial inquiry and promote peace and reconciliation.
No Diocesan Funds Missing – Board
Expressing confidence in Archbishop Ibezim’s leadership, the Board maintained that no diocesan funds had been stolen, misappropriated or misused by him.
“The Board unequivocally affirms that no money of Awka Diocese is missing, stolen, misused, or misappropriated by Archbishop Ibezim. Even the two panels set up by the Primate have not disclosed any indictment of financial misdeed by Archbishop Ibezim,” it declared.
It reaffirmed its confidence in the Archbishop’s integrity, competence and commitment to his episcopal responsibilities, insisting that he should continue to discharge his duties without interference.
Diocese Warns Bishop Ezeofor, Threatens Breakaway
In a strongly worded warning, the Board urged Bishop Ezeofor to concentrate on his responsibilities in Aguata Diocese and refrain from interfering in the administration of Awka Diocese.
It warned that any attempt to enforce the disputed appointment could attract legal action and the involvement of law enforcement agencies.
The Board equally directed all organs of Awka Diocese to remain loyal to Archbishop Ibezim, continue their lawful activities and disregard directives from Bishop Ezeofor.
It warned that failure to comply with the resolution would attract appropriate sanctions.
In its most far-reaching declaration, the Board threatened to withdraw from the Church of Nigeria if the Primate and Bishop Ezeofor continued what it described as unlawful interference in the affairs of Awka Diocese.
“The Board emphatically states that if the Primate and Bishop Ezeofor continue threatening the peace of Awka Diocese and its Archbishop and Bishop and unlawfully interfere with its affairs, it shall withdraw from the Church of Nigeria and continue with Church of England which never disturbed the Diocese,” the resolution concluded.
The development raises the prospect of a major ecclesiastical confrontation within the Anglican Communion, as the dispute between the Primate and Archbishop Ibezim moves beyond the courts to the wider leadership and membership of Awka Diocese.
The threatened withdrawal, however, remains a declaration of intent by the Diocesan Board, rather than a completed separation from the Church of Nigeria.
Trim repetitive legal arguments
Use more legally cautious wording
Clarify the timeline of the dispute

Continue Reading

News

Five Killed, Several Trapped As Diesel Tanker Crushes Four Cars 

Published

on

Maduka University

At least five persons have been confirmed dead, while several others were trapped following a fatal accident involving a fully loaded diesel tanker and four commercial vehicles in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, on Saturday.
The accident occurred at Aduloju Bus Stop, opposite Dominion City, along the busy Iwo Road–Ojoo Expressway.
Eyewitnesses said the tanker, reportedly travelling at high speed, lost control and rammed into four Nissan Micra cars conveying passengers, leaving the vehicles badly mangled.
The impact reportedly trapped several occupants inside the wreckage, prompting desperate rescue efforts by sympathisers and emergency responders.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending